Abstract
PurposeIn spite of the drive toward environmental sustainability and the attainment of sustainable development goals (SDGs), coal, oil and natural gas energy utilization has remained the Turkey's largest energy mix. In view of this concern, this study examined the role of coal and oil energy utilization in environmental sustainability drive of Turkey from the framework of sustainable development vis-à-vis income expansion over an extended period of 1965–2017.Design/methodology/approachIn this regard, the authors employ carbon emission as an environmental and dependent variable while the Gross Domestic Product per capita (GDPC), coal and oil energy consumption are the explanatory variables employed in the study.FindingsThe study found that both energy mixes (coal and oil) have a detrimental impact on the environment in both the short and long run, but oil consumption exerts a less severe impact as compared to coal energy. In addition, sustainable development via income growth is not feasible because the income–environmental degradation relationship follows a U-shaped pattern (invalidating the Environmental Kuznets curve, EKC hypothesis) especially when coal and oil remained the major source of lubrication to the economy. At least the EKC hypothesis is unattainable in Turkey as long as the country's major energy mix or primary energy (coal and oil) is in use, thus the application of other socioeconomic, macroeconomic policies might be essential.Research limitations/implicationsConsidering the lingering energy challenge associated with Turkey, this novel insight further presented useful policy perspectives to the government and stakeholders in the country's energy sector.Originality/valueThis evidence (the U-shaped relationship) is further ascertained when the aggregate primary energy is employed. Thus, this study provides a novel insight that attaining a sustainable economic growth in Turkey remained a herculean task as long as a more aggressive energy transition approach is not encouraged.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference84 articles.
1. The links between energy consumption, financial development, and economic growth in Lebanon: evidence from cointegration with unknown structural breaks;Journal of Energy,2015
2. Nature and economic growth in Turkey: what does ecological footprint imply?;Middle East Development Journal,2017
3. Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: what causes what and where?;Energy Economics,2018
4. Modelling coal rent, economic growth and CO2 emissions: does regulatory quality matter in BRICS economies?;The Science of the Total Environment,2019
5. The long-run relationship between economic growth and environmental quality;Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics and Sociology,2019
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Forecasting natural gas consumption in Turkey using fractional non-linear grey Bernoulli model optimized by grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm;Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration;2024-08-27
2. Where do we stand on cutting coal dependency? Evidence from the top coal-dependent economies;Energy Strategy Reviews;2024-07
3. The path to China's zero‐carbon target: Implications for the relationship between de‐coal, economic output, and carbon dioxide emissions;Sustainable Development;2024-06-28
4. Dynamic nexus among fossil fuels utilization, economic growth, and urbanization: a tri-regional selected countries analysis;Environmental Science and Pollution Research;2024-06-21
5. ARDL and VECM Investigation of the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Egypt, India, Mexico, Pakistan, Thailand, and Turkey: Financial Development, Globalization, and Government Expenditure Implications for Sustainable Development;Energy Technologies and Environment;2024-06-11