Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore the leadership competencies of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) college athletes and assess the potential differences between domestic and international college athletes.Design/methodology/approachA quantitative, non-experimental research design was employed, including the use of an electronic survey to collect data. Survey research allows for extensive data management and a quick data collection method (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). The survey was conducted using online Qualtrics software, which allowed convenience in administration, maintenance, nationwide distribution and data export and analysis.FindingsThe findings of this study suggest that domestic college athletes develop greater leadership competencies than their international peers.Practical implicationsThe study implications include both practical and academic contributions. The research in the area of leadership development in college athletes has been growing. Previous research has focused on the benefits of the leadership development (Lewis, 2023); however, minimal research has been dedicated to exploring actual leadership constructs within the college athlete population. Moreover, this study focused on the differences between domestic and international college athletes’ leadership constructs. International college athletes go through additional challenges while balancing the academic part of being college athletes (Ridpath, Rudd, & Stokowski, 2020).Originality/valueMinimal research has been dedicated to exploring actual leadership constructs within the student-athlete population. This study is the first study that explored leadership constructs from the quantitative lens and focusing on both domestic and international student-athletes. The literature on international student-athletes mainly focuses on the motivation arriving to the United States of America (Love & Kim, 2011) and their transitional experiences (Popp, Pierce, & Hums, 2011; Jolly, Stokowski, Paule-Koba, Arthur-Banning, & Fridley, 2022). However, limited literature focuses on the preparation of international student-athlete for life beyond their sport.
Reference57 articles.
1. Anderson, G., Carmichael, K. Y., Harper, T. J., & Huang, T. (2009). International students at four-year institutions: Developmental needs, issues, and strategies. In S.R. Harper, & S.J. Quaye (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical diverse populations (pp. 17–37). New York & London: Routledge.
2. What matters in college? Four critical years revisited;The Journal of Higher Education,1994
3. The impact of athlete-coach fit on the athletic satisfaction of NCAA Division II college athletes;Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education,2022
4. Development and validation of the leadership learning agility scale;Frontiers in Psychology,2022
5. The disconnect between athletic department employees and student-athletes on leadership programming initiatives;Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics,2023