Good to great: lessons for managers

Author:

Filbeck Greg,Gorman Raymond,Parente Diane,Zhao Xin

Abstract

PurposeJim Collins' Good to Great is but one of many popular press books on management. In his book, Collins discusses the keys to success for today's corporations. Many managers flocked to bookstores to discover what they might be missing in making their organization great. This paper aims to use methodologies more commonly found in the finance literature to validate the results of Collins' study.Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses methodologies more commonly found in finance literature (e.g. event study methodology, Fama‐French three‐factor model with momentum, buy‐and‐hold abnormal returns) to validate the results of Collins' study.FindingsThe results show that the Good to Great firms had unexceptional performance when compared to other benchmark lists of firms, on an ex‐ante or ex‐post basis.Practical implicationsFrom a management perspective, the advice that one might obtain from Good to Great should be carefully examined by managers before they implement it, only to find that great is not really so great.Originality/valueThe paper is original in its methodological design and is valuable to managers who are seeking advice for opportunities that enhance shareholder wealth.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference58 articles.

1. Al‐Ruzzieh, M.A. and Alwawi, M.B. (2009), “King Hussein cancer center: from good to great”, Journal of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Vol. 31, pp. 606‐7.

2. Amazon (2009) (The) Best Books of 2009: Editors' Top 10 in Business & Investing, available at: www.amazon.com/Business‐Investing‐Books/b?ie=UTF8&node=3 (accessed 20 January 2010).

3. Business Strategy Review (2008), “The seven best books on change”, Business Strategy Review, Vol. 19, p. 91.

4. Ayton, P. and Fischer, I. (2004), “The hot hand fallacy and the gambler's fallacy: two faces of subjective randomness?”, Memory and Cognition, Vol. 32 No. 8, pp. 1369‐78.

5. Bailey, J. (1992a), “Are manager universes acceptable performance benchmarks?”, Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 18, pp. 9‐13.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3