The use of the balanced scorecard to measure knowledge work

Author:

Wake Nicholas John

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to question whether the balanced scorecard provides an appropriate control mechanism for management control of knowledge workers. Design/methodology/approach – A case study approach is taken to explore the way in which management control of employees engaged in research and development is undertaken. Findings – The key finding of this work is that the balanced scorecard is not in itself a useful approach to management control of knowledge workers but provides an important mechanism for ensuring that there is alignment between the strategic objectives of an organisation and the work being undertaken. Research limitations/implications – The inductive approach taken in a single-company case study has provided a rich data set for exploratory research, however, this research design limits the generalisability of the findings. Practical implications – The work provides insights into how the balanced scorecard can be used in knowledge-worker environments. Originality/value – The balanced scorecard is often reported as a tool that allows organisations to cascade strategic priorities down to the level of the individual though the use of measures. This research provides an alternative explanation of how the balanced scorecard can support knowledge worker control.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference26 articles.

1. Alversson, M. (2001), “Knowledge work: ambiguity, image and identity”, Human Relations , Vol. 54 No. 7, pp. 863-886.

2. Anthony, R.N. (1965), Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis , Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.

3. Ash, R.C. and Smith-Daniels, D.E. (2004), “Managing the impact of customer support disruptions on new product development projects”, Project Management Journal , Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 3-10.

4. Bryman, A. (2001), Social Research Methods , Oxford University Press, Oxford.

5. Davenport, T.H. (2005), Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results From Knowledge Workers , Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3