Interruption of medication-assisted treatment for opioid dependence: insights from the UK
Author:
Alam Farrukh,Barker Peter
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to identify risk factors for interruptions in opioid dependence treatment and barriers to (re) entering effective treatment through real-world insight on current opioid dependence treatment in the UK.
Design/methodology/approach
– Project Access UK, a national survey deployed across multiple regions in England, Wales and Scotland, collected data on the perspectives of patients receiving medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid dependence (n=248), out-of-treatment opioid users (n=196), and physicians (n=100).
Findings
– Both patients and users reported multiple prior episodes of MAT and detoxification. Among patients, 57 per cent reported continuing illicit drugs use in addition to their treatment, 25 per cent had misused (injected or snorted) and 30 per cent had diverted (sold or given away) prescribed opioid medications. Diverted medications were currently being used by 26 per cent of out-of-treatment users; of these, 21 per cent used methadone. Supervised dosing was rated as the condition of treatment with the biggest impact on daily life. Daily supervision was a requirement for 44, 34 and 23 per cent of patients receiving methadone, mono-buprenorphine and buprenorphine-naloxone, respectively.
Practical implications
– Interruptions to opioid dependence treatment in various forms can hamper the recovery of opioid-dependent patients. The benefits of MAT may not be fully realised if treatment is interrupted due to compliance failure, or inflexible treatment programmes leading to premature treatment exit. These findings serve to highlight areas in which treatment disruption can potentially be addressed.
Originality/value
– Consideration of these findings may aid in the optimisation of treatment delivery practices to better meet the UK policy of recovery, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference28 articles.
1. Alho, H.
,
Sinclair, D.
,
Vuori, E.
and
Holopainen, A.
(2007), “Abuse liability of buprenorphine-naloxone tablets in untreated IV drug users”, Drugs and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 88 No. 1, pp. 75-8. 2. Chutuape, M.A.
,
Jasinski, D.R.
,
Fingerhood, M.I.
and
Stitzer, M.L.
(2001), “One-, three-, and six-month outcomes after brief inpatient opioid detoxification”, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 19-44. 3. Davies, C.
,
English, L.
,
Stewart, C.
,
Lodwick, A.
,
McVeigh, J.
and
Bellis, M.A.
(2011), United Kingdom Drug Situation: Annual Report to the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), United Kingdom Focal Point at the Department of Health, London. 4. Day, E.
(2012), “Commentary on Nosyk et al. (2012): detoxification from methadone maintenance therapy: how important is the exact technique that is used?”, Addiction, Vol. 107 No. 9, pp. 1630-1. 5. Degenhardt, L.
,
Larance, B.
,
Mathers, B.
,
Azim, T.
,
Kamarulzaman, A.
,
Mattick, R.
,
Panda, S.
,
Toufik, A.
,
Tyndall, M.
,
Wiessing, L.
and
Wodak, A.
and Reference Group to the United Nations on HIV and Injecting Drug Use (2007), Benefits and Risks of Pharmaceutical Opioids: Essential Treatment and Diverted Medication. A Global Review of Availability, Extra-Medical Use, Injection and the Association with HIV, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|