Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to use a variety-expanding growth model embedded in the North–South framework to study the implementation of globally desirable protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in the emerging South.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors use a variety-expanding growth model with innovation-led economic growth in both North and South. As usual, imitations targeted equally at Northern and Southern innovations only occur in the South, and the authors focus on the design of Southern IPR protection.
Findings
Welfare-maximizing degrees of Southern IPR protection are explicitly derived for both North and South. There tends to exist a North–South conflict on the right degree of protection. To resolve this conflict, the Southern government can grant appropriate subsides to support domestic innovators. The authors derive the right rate of innovation subsidies such that the conflict is resolved.
Originality/value
This paper represents the first attempt to deal with the North–South conflict on the degree of Southern IPR protection within the variety-expanding growth model. And the novel perspective is to relax the North–South tension on IPR protection via additionally implementing an appropriate innovation subsidy policy.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference24 articles.
1. Chin, J. and Grossman, G.M. (1990), “Intellectual property rights and North-South trade”, in Jones, R.W. and Krueger, A.O. (Eds), The Political Economy of International Trade, Basil Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA.
2. Intellectual property rights and R&D subsidies: are they complementary policies?;Journal of Economics,2018
3. IPR protection vs innovation subsidy: what is the choice for the Emerging South?;The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development,2016
4. Welfare effects of global patent protection;Economica,1992
5. Intellectual property rights, multinational firms and economic growth;Journal of Development Economics,2010