Strategic benchmarking:

Author:

Drew Stephen A.W.

Abstract

Financial firms often attempt to benchmark competitors or related service industries to improve new product development (NPD) and other key business processes. Although much has been learned about innovation in banks and other financial institutions in recent research studies, gaps in knowledge of best practices and cross‐industry differences remain. A Canadian survey reveals variations in strategic management of new products and innovation in banking and other financial sectors. Banks should exercise caution in interpreting the findings of benchmarking projects before adopting practices from other industries. The study also compares innovation successes and failures. Critical factors were identified which have received relatively little attention in previous work. Human resource strategies such as recruitment, evaluation systems, rewards and incentives appear to be very important for success. Investment in R&D, broadly interpreted to include process and administrative innovation, is also crucial. Joint ventures and cycle time reduction are found to be positively related to success. The study confirms the importance of a proactive and organized approach to innovation in practice.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing,Marketing

Reference41 articles.

1. American Productivity and Quality Center (1992), Planning, Organizing and Managing Benchmarking: A Users′ Guide, Houston, TX.

2. Bantel, K.A. and Jackson, S.E. (1989), “Top management and innovation in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, special issue, summer 1989, pp. 107‐24.

3. Barras, R. (1990), “Interactive innovation in financial and business services: the vanguard of the service revolution”, Research Policy, Vol. 19, pp. 215‐37.

4. Booz, Allen & Hamilton (1982), New Products Management for the 1980s, Booz, Allen & Hamilton Inc., New York, NY.

5. Bowers, M.R. (1986), “The new product development process: a suggested model for banks ”, Journal of Retail Banking, Vol. 8, pp. 19‐24.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3