A study of the use of simulated work task situations in interactive information retrieval evaluations
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to report a study of how the test instrument of a simulated work task situation is used in empirical evaluations of interactive information retrieval (IIR) and reported in the research literature. In particular, the author is interested to learn whether the requirements of how to employ simulated work task situations are followed, and whether these requirements call for further highlighting and refinement.
Design/methodology/approach
– In order to study how simulated work task situations are used, the research literature in question is identified. This is done partly via citation analysis by use of Web of Science®, and partly by systematic search of online repositories. On this basis, 67 individual publications were identified and they constitute the sample of analysis.
Findings
– The analysis reveals a need for clarifications of how to use simulated work task situations in IIR evaluations. In particular, with respect to the design and creation of realistic simulated work task situations. There is a lack of tailoring of the simulated work task situations to the test participants. Likewise, the requirement to include the test participants’ personal information needs is neglected. Further, there is a need to add and emphasise a requirement to depict the used simulated work task situations when reporting the IIR studies.
Research limitations/implications
– Insight about the use of simulated work task situations has implications for test design of IIR studies and hence the knowledge base generated on the basis of such studies.
Originality/value
– Simulated work task situations are widely used in IIR studies, and the present study is the first comprehensive study of the intended and unintended use of this test instrument since its introduction in the late 1990’s. The paper addresses the need to carefully design and tailor simulated work task situations to suit the test participants in order to obtain the intended authentic and realistic IIR under study.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference82 articles.
1. Airio, E.
(2008), “Who benefits from CLIR in web retrieval?”,
Journal of Documentation
, Vol. 64 No. 5, pp. 760-778. 2. Arapakis, I.
,
Jose, J.M.
and
Gray, P.D.
(2008), “Affective feedback: an investigation into the role of emotion in the information seeking process”, in
Myaeng, S.H.
,
Oard, D.W.
and
Sebastiani, F.
(Eds),
Proceedings of the 31st ACM Sigir Conference on Research and Development of Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2008)
, ACM Press, Singapore, pp. 395-402. 3. Belkin, N.J.
(2008), “Some(what) grand challenges for information retrieval”,
ACM SIGIR Forum
, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 47-54. 4. Bell, J.D.
and
Ruthven, I.
(2004), “Searcher’s assessment of task complexity for web searching”, in
McDonald, S.
and
Tait, J.
(Eds),
Proceeding of the 26th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2004)
, Springer Verlag and University of Sunderland, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 57-71. 5. Bierig, R.
and
Goker, A.
(2006), “Time, location and interest: an empirical and user-centred study”, in
Ruthven, I.
,
Borlund, P.
,
Ingwersen, P.
,
Belkin, N.
,
Tombros, A.
and
Vakkari, P.
(Eds),
Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Information Interaction in Context (IIiX 2006)
, ACM Press, Copenhagen, pp. 79-87.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|