“I think sometimes the whole process is just a little bit intimidating”: modeling the health insurance decision-making process

Author:

Vardell EmilyORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis qualitative study explores how individuals understand health insurance concepts and make health insurance purchase decisions. The study sought to develop a model of the health insurance decision-making process.Design/methodology/approachThis study used semi-structured interview questions and the micro-moment time-line interview technique with newly hired employees to discuss the steps that individuals follow when making health insurance decisions. The researcher used an open coding approach to analyze the steps listed by each participant, and emergent themes were used to code all interview transcripts in Atlas.ti.FindingsThis study identified information tactics used by individuals when evaluating health insurance documentation. The findings also shed light on the personal reflection individuals undertake when making their health insurance choices.Practical implicationsThe information needs and preferred information sources identified in this study will be of interest to information professionals and human resources officers providing assistance with health insurance enrolment.Originality/valueThe findings demonstrating that participants characterized their health insurance choice as a shared decision is a novel contribution of this study.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference40 articles.

1. Selecting a provider: what factors influence patients' decision making?;Journal of Healthcare Management,2011

2. Preparedness of Americans for the affordable care act,2014

3. Determinants of coverage decisions in health insurance marketplaces: Consumers’ decision-making abilities and the amount of information in their choice environment;Health Services Research,2015

4. One fish, two fish, red fish, blue fish: effects of price frames, brand names, and choice set size on Medicare part D insurance plan decisions;Medical Care Research and Review,2012

5. Physician trainees' decision making and information processing: choice size and Medicare Part D;PLOS ONE,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3