Abstract
PurposeThis study investigates an approach to book metrics for research evaluation that takes into account the complexity of scholarly monographs. This approach is based on work sets – unique scholarly works and their within-work related bibliographic entities – for scholarly monographs in national databases for research output.Design/methodology/approachThis study examines bibliographic records on scholarly monographs acquired from four European databases (VABB in Flanders, Belgium; CROSBI in Croatia; CRISTIN in Norway; COBISS in Slovenia). Following a data enrichment process using metadata from OCLC WorldCat and Amazon Goodreads, the authors identify work sets and the corresponding ISBNs. Next, on the basis of the number of ISBNs per work set and the presence in WorldCat, they design a typology of scholarly monographs: Globally visible single-expression works, Globally visible multi-expression works, Miscellaneous and Globally invisible works.FindingsThe findings show that the concept “work set” and the proposed typology can aid the identification of influential scholarly monographs in the social sciences and humanities (i.e. the Globally visible multi-expression works).Practical implicationsIn light of the findings, the authors outline requirements for the bibliographic control of scholarly monographs in national databases for research output that facilitate the use of the approach proposed here.Originality/valueThe authors use insights from library and information science (LIS) to construct complexity-sensitive book metrics. In doing so, the authors, on the one hand, propose a solution to a problem in research evaluation and, on the other hand, bring to attention the need for a dialogue between LIS and neighbouring communities that work with bibliographic data.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference55 articles.
1. Benchmarking and evaluating the interpretation of bibliographic records;International Journal on Digital Libraries,2019
2. Citations to the ‘introduction to informetrics’ indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google scholar;Scientometrics,2010
3. The concept of a work in WorldCat: an application of FRBR;Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services,2003
4. Which role do non-source items play in the social sciences? A case study in political science in Germany;Scientometrics,2014
5. A study on the application method of the functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR) to the online public access catalog (OPAC) in Korean libraries;Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services,2006
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献