Labor, classification and productions of culture on Netflix

Author:

Floegel Diana

Abstract

PurposeThis paper examines promotional practices Netflix employs via Twitter and its automated recommendation system in order to deepen our understanding of how streaming services contribute to sociotechnical inequities under capitalism.Design/methodology/approachTweets from two Netflix Twitter accounts as well as material features of Netflix's recommendation system were qualitatively analyzed using inductive analysis and the constant comparative method in order to explore dimensions of Netflix's promotional practices.FindingsTwitter accounts and the recommendation system profit off people's labor to promote content, and such labor allows Netflix to create and refine classification practices wherein both people and content are categorized in inequitable ways. Labor and classification feed into Netflix's production of culture via appropriation on Twitter and algorithmic decision-making within both the recommendation system and broader AI-driven production practices.Social implicationsAssemblages that include algorithmic recommendation systems are imbued with structural inequities and therefore unable to be fixed by merely diversifying cultural industries or retooling algorithms on streaming platforms. It is necessary to understand systemic injustices within these systems so that we may imagine and enact just alternatives.Originality/valueFindings demonstrate that via surveillance tactics that exploit people's labor for promotional gains, enforce normative classification schemes, and culminate in normative cultural productions, Netflix engenders practices that regulate bodies and culture in ways that exemplify interconnections between people, machines, and social institutions. These interconnections further reflect and result in material inequities that crystalize within sociotechnical processes.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference92 articles.

1. Disciplining knowledge at the library of congress;Knowledge Organization,2012

2. The case for taxonomic reparations;Knowledge Organization,2016

3. Affective economies;Social Text,2004

4. The work of being watched: interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure;Critical Studies in Media Communication,2002

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Las claves del éxito en streaming;VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review / Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual;2024-05-09

2. Intelligent recommendation model of tourist places based on collaborative filtering and user preferences;Applied Artificial Intelligence;2023-04-21

3. Surveillance as information practice;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2023-01-18

4. Audiobook apps: exploring reading practices and technical affordances in the player features;Information Research: an international electronic journal;2022-12-15

5. Usage and impact of the internet-of-things-based smart home technology: a quality-of-life perspective;Universal Access in the Information Society;2022-11-16

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3