Community bank product design within an asymmetric competitive market

Author:

McKee Gregory J,Kagan Albert

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess product and service arrays of community banks within competitive markets that are impacted by varying sized financial institutions. A cost efficiency model is used to understand the relationship of product offerings and business cycle response upon bank performance. Design/methodology/approach – A cost efficiency model is used to understand the relationship of product offerings and business cycle response upon bank performance. Markets comprised of alternate size and type of financial institutions are compared. Findings – Greater values of X_EFF i when institutions compete are observed in this analysis. Cost efficiency is lowest when community banks are the only institution in the market, and second lowest when credit unions are the only competing institutions. Call report data are analyzed from 1994 to 2013. The number of big banks increases community bank efficiency and efficiency of large banks. Also, the number of community banks does affect big bank cost efficiency. The magnitude of the effect pertaining to the number of community banks upon big bank efficiency is much smaller than that of the number of big banks on community bank efficiency. Originality/value – This study considers cost efficiency and profitability as measures of institution on the performance of a competing institutional type. The modeling approach uses cost efficiency as a method of observing the performance of financial institutions and an explanation of how firms persist, grow, and respond to changes in technology or regulation. The effects of the presence of each type of financial institution on the performance of another type are compared. Situations in which any number of one or more institutional types is present in a market are considered for analysis purposes.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing,Marketing

Reference65 articles.

1. Acharya, R.N. , Kagan, A. and Rao Lingam, S. (2008), “Online banking applications and community bank performance”, International Journal of Bank Marketing , Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 418-439.

2. Allred, A.T. and Addams, H.L. (2000), “Service quality at banks and credit unions: what do their customers say?”, International Journal of Bank Marketing , Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 200-207.

3. Anderson, R.G. and Liu, Y. (2013), “Banks and credit unions: competition not going away”, The Regional Economist , Vol. 2013, April, pp. 4-9.

4. Bauer, K.J. , Miles, L.L. and Nishikawa, T. (2009), “The effect of mergers on credit union performance”, Journal of Banking & Finance , Vol. 33 No. 12, pp. 2267-2274.

5. Becker, F.R. (2004), “Conversion of insured credit unions to mutual savings banks”, available at: www.nafcu.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=3122 (accessed June 15, 2014).

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3