Empirical test of a new product evolutionary cycle

Author:

W.T. Lau Eddy

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the drivers of change in product evolution and to examine the relationship between company performance and active management of the driving forces behind product changes. Design/methodology/approach – An exploratory and qualitative research approach was adopted to explore the drivers of change and the definition of active management of forces. In the second stage, an analytical and quantitative research approach was adopted to examine the relationship between company performance and active management measures. A questionnaire survey was used in both stages to collect data. Findings – Contrary to the traditional product evolutionary cycle, influential bodies (e.g. NGOs and media) are found to be another force that drives product evolution, in addition to managerial creativity, market factors and government mediation. Except for government mediation, the active management of all these forces is found to be associated with company performance. Research limitations/implications – The research was conducted in the real estate industry of Hong Kong. The particular nature of the industry would have a bearing on the outcome of the research. Extending the research to other industries is highly recommended. Practical implications – The research leads to a number of management practices that define the active management of product change driving forces. The implementation of these practices may have a positive impact on improving company performance, especially in brand recognition. Originality/value – This is the first empirical test of a new product evolutionary cycle that incorporates influential bodies as one of the driving forces. The approach to correlate company performance with active management of forces is also a pioneer one that gives useful insight on why some firms can maintain leadership in the market in terms of brand recognition.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing

Reference41 articles.

1. Adner, R. and Levinthal, D. (2001), “Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: implications for product and process innovation”, Management Science, Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 611-628.

2. Boström, M. and Hallström, K.T. (2010), “NGO power in global social and environmental standard-setting”, Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 36-59.

3. Brown, C. (2009), “Gain brand recognition and acceptance through company awards”, PopularArticles, available at: www.populararticles.com/article186663.html (accessed 29 October 2011).

4. Brubaker, R. (2012), “The opportunities for business beyond usual”, paper presented at Social Entrepreneurship Open Lecture, July 27, Institute for Entrepreneurship, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.

5. Chan, E.H.W. , Tang, B. and Wong, W. (2002), “Density control and the quality of living space: a case study of private housing development in Hong Kong”, Habitat International, Vol. 26, pp. 159-175.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3