Author:
Nagi Claire,Davies Jason,Shine Laura
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to describe the development, content and structure of an intensive group-based intervention designed to address a range of needs common to individuals within low secure forensic mental health settings. Additionally, the feasibility, acceptability, resource implications and levels of participation and understanding are evaluated.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper describes the development, content and structure of an intensive group-based intervention designed to address a range of needs common to individuals within low secure forensic mental health settings. Additionally, the feasibility, acceptability, resource implications and levels of participation and understanding are evaluated.
Findings
– Analysis showed that the intervention was well received by staff and participants and that those with low self-report knowledge at the start showed large improvements. Recorded levels of participation and understanding were lower than expected.
Research limitations/implications
– Group-based interventions in low secure settings can be developed from existing “what works” information. Such treatments can feasibly be delivered although participants may need support – something which is not reported in many intervention studies. Research is now needed to assess the impact of the General Treatment & Recovery Programme (GTRP) intervention on participants.
Originality/value
– The development of treatment programmes for offending behaviour within low secure forensic mental health settings is still in its infancy. This paper outlines and describes the development of such an intervention, namely the GTRP.
Subject
Law,Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference64 articles.
1. American Psychiatric Association
(2000), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders (DSM-IV-TR), APA, Washington, DC.
2. Andrews, D.A.
and
Bonta, J.
(2010), The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, 5th ed., LexisNexis, Newark, NJ.
3. Andrews, D.A.
,
Bonta, J.
and
Hoge, R.D.
(1990), “Classification for effective rehabilitation: rediscovering psychology”, Criminal Justice and Behaviour, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 19-52.
4. Arsuffi, L.
(2008), “The triple C programme: a qualitative evaluation of a new anger management protocol piloted in a British medium secure unit”, Forensic Update, Vol. 95, pp. 29-35.
5. Axelrod, S.R.
,
Perepletchikova, F.
,
Holtzman, K.
and
Sinha, R.
(2011), “Emotion regulation and substance use frequency in women with substance dependence and borderline personality disorder receiving dialectical behaviour therapy”, American Journal of Drug Alcohol Abuse, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 37-42.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献