The corporate strategic‐operational divide and TQM

Author:

Leonard Denis,McAdam Rodney

Abstract

Aims principally to identify the main issues relating to the strategic impact and application of total quality management (TQM). Uses a grounded theory inductive research methodology involving 19 case study organisations. In this approach, the deep rich data gained through the dialogue and story telling, is critical to the research study findings. Therefore, the findings are presented largely in the form of transcript quotes and coding analysis. Furthermore, the grounded theory approach enables simple constructs to be created and developed throughout the research discourse. The findings indicate that largely bureaucratic approaches to TQM and strategy exist without proper integration of employee and customer feedback. TQM mainly impacted the strategy process at the objective setting level, forming a strategic‐operational divide, reflecting a tactical emphasis for TQM deployment. Thus, there is a need for TQM to be considered from a philosophical level rather than simply as an operational tool. A considerable gap was found to exist between organisational rhetoric, in relation to strategy and TQM, in comparison to organisational practice.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference41 articles.

1. Allan, J. (1998), “Perspectives on research in quality management”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 9 Nos 4 & 5, pp. 51‐5.

2. Aravindan, P., Devadasan, S.R. and Selladurai, V. (1996), “A focused system for strategic quality management”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability ManagementInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 13 No. 8, pp. 79‐97.

3. Barclay, C.A. (1993), “Quality strategy and TQM policies: empirical evidence, management international review”, Special Issue: Strategic Quality Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 87‐99.

4. Bergstrom, R.Y. (1995), “Measures to shape the future through quality”, Production, Vol. 107 No. 8, pp. 50‐2.

5. Bilich, F. and Neto, A.A. (1997), “Strategic total quality management”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 8, Nos 2 & 3, pp. 588‐9.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3