Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to discuss how to design an individual performance measure, which usually means the measurement practitioner must deal with many requirements other than the ones that can be found when designing a complete performance measurement system.Design/methodology/approachDifferent requirements suggested in the performance measurement literature from the past 20 years have been sorted out in order to structure the different tasks to conduct when designing a measure.FindingsExplains how to form or select a formula that fulfils the purpose of a measure. Defines 15 parameters that fully specify a measure. Clarifies positive and negative measure properties.Practical implicationsMeasurement regimes are often built without a clear understanding of what is being measured. The article includes several practical tools that can be used when designing a performance measure.Originality/valueDiscusses the question “how to measure?”, while most of past research in the field has been aimed at solving “what to measure?”.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference14 articles.
1. Crawford, K. and Cox, J. (1990), “Designing performance measurement systems for just in time operations”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 28 No. 11, pp. 2025‐36.
2. Cross, K.F. and Lynch, R.L. (1992), “For good measure”, CMA Magazine, April, pp. 20‐3.
3. Franco, M. and Bourne, M. (2003), “Factors that play a role in ‘managing through measures’”, Management Decision, Vol. 41 No. 8, pp. 698‐710.
4. Globerson, S. (1985), “Issues in developing a performance criteria system for an organisation”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 639‐46.
5. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992), “The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, January/February, pp. 71‐9.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献