Author:
Neher Margit Saskia,Ståhl Christian,Nilsen Per
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to explore what opportunities for learning practitioners in rheumatology perceive of in their daily practice, using a typology of workplace learning to categorize these opportunities.
Design/methodology/approach
– Thirty-six practitioners from different professions in rheumatology were interviewed. Data were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis with a directed approach, and were categorized according to a typology of formal and informal learning.
Findings
– The typology was adjusted to fit the categories resulting from the analysis. Further analysis showed that work processes with learning as a by-product in general, and relationships with other people in the workplace in particular, were perceived as important for learning in the workplace. The use of many recognized learning opportunities was lower. Barriers for learning were a perceived low leadership awareness of learning opportunities and factors relating to workload and the organization of work.
Research limitations/implications
– The generalizability of results from all qualitative inquiries is limited by nature, and the issue of transferability to other contexts is for the reader to decide. Further studies will need to confirm the results of the study, as well as the proposed enhancement of the typology with which the results were categorized.
Practical implications
– The study highlights the importance of relationships in the workplace for informal learning in rheumatology practice. In the clinical context, locally adapted strategies at organizational and individual levels are needed to maximize opportunities for both professional and interprofessional informal learning, taking the importance of personal relationships into account. The findings also suggest a need for increased continuing professional education in the specialty.
Originality/value
– The workplace learning typology that was used in the study showed good applicability to empirical health-care study data, but may need further development. The study confirmed that informal workplace learning is an important part of learning in rheumatology. Further studies are needed to clarify how informal and formal learning in the rheumatology clinic may be supported in workplaces with different characteristics.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Development,Social Psychology
Reference37 articles.
1. Antonacopoulou, E.P.
,
Jarvis, P.
,
Andersen, V.
,
Elkjær, B.
and
Høyrup, S.
(2006),
Learning, Working and Living: Mapping the Terrain of Working Life Learning
, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire.
2. Bartels, E.M.
(2009), “How to keep up with medical literature”,
Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology
, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 281-290.
3. Bell, J.
and
Dale, M.
(1999), “Informal learning in the workplace, Department for Education and Employment, Research Report No 134”, available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130401151655/https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationDetail/Page1/RB134 (accessed 4 April 2014).
4. Billett, S.
(2008), “Learning throughout working life: a relational interdependence between personal and social agency”,
British Journal of Educational Studies
, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 39-58.
5. Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education
(2002), “Defining interprofessional education”, available at: www.caipe.org.uk/about-us/defining-ipe/ (accessed 12 May 2014).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献