Author:
de Guzman Melchor C.,Swaroop Kumar Korni
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine and propose an extension of Lundman's theory. Lundman presented a theoretical framework that predicted the evolution of policing from an informal to a formal type. Essentially, he stated that the types of policing in society were determined by the patterns of solidarity, élite interests, and crimes rates/images of disorder. This research argued that the theory could be extended not only to predict the type of policing but also the quality and quantity of policing. Particularly, this research explored the relationships of the élite interest and the rates/images of criminality to policing practices by examining evidence from the research literature about India.Design/methodology/approachResearch studies about Indian police practices were extracted from the major western criminology, criminal justice, and policing journals. Using content analyses, two propositions were analyzed. The first proposition was that the evidence from the literature would suggest that threats of the disadvantaged and marginalized groups against the dominant élite groups would influence the quality of policing. The second proposition was that the evidence from the literature would show that rates and images of criminality would influence the quantity of policing.FindingsVery little quantitative literature exists to examine the propositions using meta‐analysis. The existing policing literature from India that was examined indicated support for the propositions.Research limitations/implicationsAs the literature was mostly anecdotal and normative, a more dynamic view of the relationships among the variables should be explored using the positivist approach.Originality/valuePolice characters are influenced by the social order. Systemic reforms often fail because of the obstacles presented by the social and political influences. Therefore, a larger social reform should be undertaken.
Subject
Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference51 articles.
1. Arnold, D. (1976), “The police and colonial control in South India”, Social Scientist, Vol. 4 No. 12, pp. 3‐16.
2. Arnold, D. (1977), “The armed police and colonial rule in South India, 1914‐1947”, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 101‐25.
3. Babbie, E.R. (2010), The Practice of Social Research, 12th ed., Wadsworth Cengage, Belmont, CA.
4. Bachman, R. and Schutt, R.K. (2007), The Practice of Research in Criminology and Criminal Justice, 3rd ed., Sage, Los Angeles, CA.
5. Bayley, D.H. (1962), “The pedagogy of democracy: coercive public protest in India”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 663‐72.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献