Psychologically informed environments for homeless people: resident and staff experiences

Author:

Phipps Catriona,Seager Martin,Murphy Lee,Barker Chris

Abstract

Purpose Many homeless people have significant levels of early adverse experiences and consequent mental health difficulties. The purpose of this paper is to examine the experiences of residents and staff living and working in a psychologically informed environment (PIE), a new model of hostel for homeless people which aims to update and make more flexible the principles of the therapeutic community, thereby meeting the psychological and emotional needs of residents. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews were carried out with nine residents, ten staff and five psychotherapists at two PIE hostels in London. The data were analysed using thematic analysis with a phenomenological epistemological approach. Findings Analysis generated 18 themes for residents and staff combined, organised into five domains: what makes a home, resident needs, managing relationships, reflective practice and theory vs practice of PIEs. The study suggests that PIEs broadly meet their aim in providing a different type of environment from standard hostels. Efforts to build relationships with residents are particularly prioritised. This work can be challenging for staff and reflective practice groups provide a supportive forum. There are limits to the extent to which the theoretical PIE can be put into practice in the current political and economic climate. Originality/value This is one of the first qualitative studies of PIEs. It provides perspectives on their theoretical background as well as how they operate and are experienced in practice. It may be informative to services intending to establish a PIE and to commissioners in assessing appropriate resources.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference67 articles.

1. Attachment in mental health institutions: a commentary;Attachment and Human Development,2001

2. The experiences of professionals working with homeless people in a clinical setting: a qualitative study;Housing, Care and Support,2013

3. Asay, T.I. and Lambert, M.J. (1999), “The empirical case for the common factor”, in Duncan, B., Miller, S. and Hubble, M. (Eds), The Heart and Soul of Change: What Works in Therapy, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 23-55.

4. Psychotherapy and social support: integrating research on psychological helping;Clinical Psychology Review,2002

5. Biggerstaff, D. (2012), “Qualitative research methods in psychology”, in Rossi, G. (Ed.), Psychology – Selected Papers, InTech, Rijeka, pp. 175-206.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3