Abstract
Purpose
– The aim of this paper is to contribute to the literature that has sought to deconstruct this ideologically driven depiction by demonstrating how the existent enterprise culture in post-Soviet spaces not only challenges the depiction of the entrepreneur as a heroic icon of the legitimate capitalist culture but also opens up the feasibility of alternative futures beyond legitimate profit-driven capitalism. The starting point of this paper is that the enterprise culture is often viewed as inextricably related to the legitimate capitalist economy.
Design/methodology/approach
– To unravel the nature of the enterprise culture in lived practice, this paper reports a 2006 survey involving face-to-face interviews with 90 entrepreneurs in Moscow.
Findings
– Only 7 per cent of the Muscovite entrepreneurs surveyed pursue profit-driven legitimate entrepreneurship. The vast majority adopts social goals to varying degrees and operates wholly or partially in the informal economy. The outcome is to challenge the depiction of an enterprise culture and capitalism as inextricably inter-related and to open up entrepreneurship and enterprise culture in this post-Soviet space to re-signification as demonstrative of the feasibility of imagining and enacting alternative futures beyond capitalism.
Research limitations/implications
– These findings are tentative, as they are based on a small-scale study of just one post-socialist city. Further research is now required to analyse whether the lived practices of entrepreneurship and enterprise cultures are similarly diverse in other post-Soviet spaces as well as beyond.
Originality/value
– This is the first paper to evaluate critically the assumption that enterprise culture is a part of the legitimate capitalist economy in post-Soviet spaces.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management
Reference72 articles.
1. Aidis, R.
,
Welter, F.
,
Smallbone, D.
and
Isakova, N.
(2006), “Female entrepreneurship in transition economies: the case of Lithuania and Ukraine”, Feminist Economics, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 157-183.
2. Amin, A.
,
Cameron, A.
and
Hudson, R.
(2002), “The UK social economy: panacea or problem?”, in
Bartle,
,
I.
,
Castiglione,
and
D.
(Eds), Social Capital in the Economy, Russell Papers Civic Series 2002/4, University of Essex, Colchester, pp. 22-45.
3. Anderson, P.
(2000), “Renewals”, New Left Review, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1-22.
4. Antonopoulos, G.A.
and
Mitra, J.
(2009), “The hidden enterprise of bootlegging cigarettes out of Greece: two schemes of illegal entrepreneurship”, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 1-8.
5. Armstrong, P.
(2005), Critique of Entrepreneurship: People and Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献