An appropriate risk addendum for risky projects

Author:

Bhaumik Pradip K.

Abstract

Purpose – Despite many troublesome aspects in its use, the risk-adjusted discount rate has survived and continues to be extensively used by practitioners. While the appropriate discount rate for projects as risky as the current business operations of the firm can be estimated relatively easily as the firm’s cost of capital, no clear guideline is available for projects with a higher risk profile. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate an appropriate risk addendum for such risky projects. Design/methodology/approach – Extending the framework developed by Davies et al. (2012), the perceived risk in a project is captured by focussing on a downside case scenario and estimating its probability and severity. An expression is then developed for the risk addendum (as an addendum to the firm’s cost of capital) that can be used to find the value of a risky project. Findings – The risk addendum is found to depend only on the product of the probability (p) and the severity (d) of the downside case scenario and not on either of them individually It was also found that the risk addendum rises fast for projects with shorter lives and so is the highest for risky projects with short lives. Practical implications – Managers can use the expression derived to evaluate an appropriate risk addendum for risky projects. Originality/value – The paper suggests a simple framework to quantify the risk involved in a project and to evaluate an appropriate risk addendum.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Finance

Reference45 articles.

1. Albrecht, G.R. (2012), “A review of the three arguments used to justify including a risk-premium on the discount factor”, Journal of Legal Economics , Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 1-15.

2. ANSI (2000), “Risk assessment and risk reduction: a guideline to estimate, evaluate and reduce risks associated with machine tools”, ANSI B11.19 TR3, 20(K), ANSI, New York, NY.

3. Ariel, R. (1998), “Risk adjusted discount rates and the present value of risky costs”, The Financial Review , Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 17-29.

4. Arnold, T. (2014), A Pragmatic Guide to Real Options , Palgrave Macmillan, London, p. 208.

5. Arnold, T. and Nixon, T. (2011), “Measuring investment value: free cash flow, net present value, and economic value added”, in Baker, H.K. and English, P. (Eds), Capital Budgeting Valuation: Financial Analysis for Today's Investment Projects , John Wiley & Sons and Robert W. Kolb Series, Hoboken, NJ, p. 518.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. One-size risk-adjusted discount rate does not fit all risky projects;The Journal of Risk Finance;2022-03-28

2. Economic Decision-Making and the Impact of Risk Management;International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology;2019-07

3. Economic Decision Making and Risk Management;International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management;2019-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3