Author:
Stirling Phoebe,Burgess Gemma
Abstract
Purpose
This paper asks how the introduction of “smart” digital technologies might affect the goals that can be attributed to telecare for older people, by those coordinating its provision.
Design/methodology/approach
A total of 29 in-depth, qualitative interviews were conducted with local authorities, housing associations and other organisations coordinating smart telecare provision, as well as telecare manufacturers and suppliers. Interviews were analysed by using qualitative thematic analysis.
Findings
The analysis reveals discrepancies between the goals and outcomes of smart telecare provision, according to those coordinating service delivery. This study concludes that the goal for smart telecare to be preventative and cost-efficient may be complicated by various organisational and operational challenges associated with coordinating provision.
Originality/value
New, “smart” telecare technology for older people stands apart from earlier, user-activated or automatic devices. It may have distinct and under-researched organisational and ethical implications.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference67 articles.
1. Passive in-home health and wellness monitoring: overview, value and examples,2009
2. Profiles and predictors of smart home technology adoption by older adults;Occupation, Participation and Health,2019
3. Telecare – where, when, why and for whom does it work? A realist evaluation of a Norwegian project;Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering,2017
4. Telecare for older people: promoting independence, participation, and identity;Research on Aging,2013
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献