Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of the study was to explore and articulate how Socratic seminar might be considered more completely as part of justice-focused social studies classroom disciplinary practices.Design/methodology/approachThe authors reviewed the literature on Socratic seminar and developed a model for its practical use. The authors used the model to demonstrate its use in teaching civil rights history, as an example for implementation.FindingsSocratic seminar is an instructional method that layers several disciplinary literacy skills within social studies that have the combined potential to create a transformative dialogue within the classroom and communities, especially when leveraged in more complex multi-text ways. Through the seminars, students can better understand what the authors name horizontal historical analysis, the perspective on concurrent social justice movements and vertical curricular analysis or how social justice movements experience continuity and change over time.Practical implicationsThe authors provided an accessible model for teachers and students to use Socratic seminars as part of transformational social studies practices.Social implicationsThe authors demonstrate how the Socratic seminar model can provide students with the intellectual foundation for considering social action as more critically informed civic agents.Originality/valueThe authors examine and offer a model of how Socratic seminar can engage students in vertical and/or horizontal historical analysis for transformational purposes. Further, the authors identify how Socratic seminar can build the skills and dispositions of social studies, provide space for knowledge creation through critical historical inquiry and help reframe how teachers and students understand learning and human relationships by shifting the classroom power and promoting student agency through dialogue.
Reference80 articles.
1. Allen, J. (2010), “The challenge of dialogue in teacher education”, Sites of Possibility: Critical Dialogue across Educational Settings, pp. 175-191.
2. The limits of master narratives in history textbooks: an analysis of representations of Martin Luther King, Jr;Teachers College Record,2006
3. Techies, the tea party, and the race to the top: the rise of the new upper-middle class and tensions in the rightist politics of federal education reform;The Educational Forum,2016
4. Banks, J.A. and Nguyen, D. (2008), “Diversity and citizenship education”, Handbook of Research in Social Studies Education, pp. 137-154.