Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the impact of cultural specificity on hotel’s online reviews and ratings.
Design/methodology/approach
Using Hofstede’s scale of cultural differences, it analyzes 1,821 comments about the Catalonia Sagrada Familia Hotel across 77 countries. Logistic regression is used for data analysis.
Findings
It is found that detailed reviews tend to be provided by the guests who belong to a low-power distance culture, are collectivistic, are masculine, have a low uncertainty avoidance, are long-term orientated or are indulgent. On the other hand, the customers who tend to deviate from the prior average ratings come from high-power distance societies, are individualists, are feminists, belong to a high uncertainty avoidance culture, are long-term oriented or are indulgent.
Originality/value
These findings extend the hospitality management literature and potentially help the hotel managers to better understand their customers’ behavior in a web-based environment.
Subject
Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
Reference65 articles.
1. Ady, M. and Quadri-Felitti, D. (2015), “Consumer research identifies how to present travel review content for more bookings”, available at: www.trustyou.com/resources/consumer-research-identifies-how-to-present-travel-review-content-for-optimal-bookingss (accessed 27 January 2018).
2. Which group do you want to travel with? A study of rating differences among groups in online travel reviews;Electronic Commerce Research and Applications,2017
3. Effects of cultural difference on users’ online experience with a destination website: a structural equation modelling approach;Journal of Destination Marketing and Management,2017
4. Investigating cross-national heterogeneity in the adoption of online hotel reviews;International Journal of Hospitality Management,2016
5. Booking.com (2017), “About Booking.com”, available at: www.booking.com/content/about.en-gb.html (accessed 4 April 2017).
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献