Does culture influence our ways in handling COVID-19?

Author:

Oey EliaORCID,Rahardjo Benjamin SuwitoORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has hit all nations across the globe since the beginning of 2020. As the whole world is connected ever than before, the virus has spread very fast and affected almost all nations worldwide. Despite facing a common enemy, each nation reacts and manages the virus differently. The research studies how culture influences the way nations and society choose different approaches towards the pandemic.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses classical cultural dimension by Hofstede and links them with three conflict management styles “integrating”, “avoiding” and “competing” in analysing three main measurements of the pandemic (test rate, case rate and death rate). The study analyses data from 116 countries and clusters them using a combination of agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC) and K-means clustering.FindingsThe study shows there are six nation clusters with different ways of handling COVID-19, driven by their underlying dominant culture dimension. It shows that individualistic culture combined with high indulgence dimension makes fatality worse, while nations with collectivism culture or uncertainty avoidance culture are better off, especially if accompanied with restraint dimension or long-term orientation.Originality/valueThe originality of the research lies in linking Hofstede cultural dimension with modified Onishi's conflict management style in analysing how different cultures and nations manage the COVID-19 pandemic.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science

Reference63 articles.

1. Customer-oriented benefit segmentation: an integrated approach;International Journal of Business Innovation and Research,2014

2. Ancona, D. (2012), “Sensemaking: framing and acting in the unknown”, in Snook, S.A., Nohria, N. and Khurana, R. (Eds), The Handbook for Teaching Leadership: Knowing, Doing and Being, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 3-19.

3. Looking beyond the immediate crisis response: analyzing the organizational culture to understand the crisis;Journal ofthe Association for Communication Administration,1995

4. Conceptualizing and measuring distance in international business research: recurring questions and best practice;Journal of International Business Studies,2018

5. Culture and the capital–performance nexus in dual banking systems;Economic Modelling,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3