Variables influencing information security policy compliance

Author:

Sommestad Teodor,Hallberg Jonas,Lundholm Kristoffer,Bengtsson Johan

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify variables that influence compliance with information security policies of organizations and to identify how important these variables are. Design/methodology/approach – A systematic review of empirical studies described in extant literature is performed. This review found 29 studies meeting its inclusion criterion. The investigated variables in these studies and the effect size reported for them were extracted and analysed. Findings – In the 29 studies, more than 60 variables have been studied in relation to security policy compliance and incompliance. Unfortunately, no clear winners can be found among the variables or the theories they are drawn from. Each of the variables only explains a small part of the variation in people's behaviour and when a variable has been investigated in multiple studies the findings often show a considerable variation. Research limitations/implications – It is possible that the disparate findings of the reviewed studies can be explained by the sampling methods used in the studies, the treatment/control of extraneous variables and interplay between variables. These aspects ought to be addressed in future research efforts. Practical implications – For decision makers who seek guidance on how to best achieve compliance with their information security policies should recognize that a large number of variables probably influence employees' compliance. In addition, both their influence strength and interplay are uncertain and largely unknown. Originality/value – This is the first systematic review of research on variables that influence compliance with information security policies of organizations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Management Science and Operations Research,Business and International Management,Management Information Systems

Reference53 articles.

1. Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 179-211.

2. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1979), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 27, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 65-116.

3. Asgharpour, F. , Liu, D. and Camp, L.J. (2007), “Experimental evaluations of expert and non-expert computer users' mental models of security risks”, The Workshop on the Economics of Information Security (WEIS), Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 1-24, available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.144.1585&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

4. Beautement, A. , Sasse, M.A. and Wonham, M. (2009), “The compliance budget: managing security behaviour in organisations”, Proceedings New Security Paradigms Workshop, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA, pp. 47-58.

5. Becker, B.J. and Wu, M.-J. (2007), “The synthesis of regression slopes in meta-analysis”, Statistical Science, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 414-429.

Cited by 147 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3