Connecting the dots: a bibliometric review of Habermasian theory in public relations research

Author:

Buhmann AlexanderORCID,Ihlen Øyvind,Aaen-Stockdale CraigORCID

Abstract

Purpose Meta reviews are central for mapping the state of the field, consolidating the heterogeneous public relations body of knowledge, and pointing to new potential research directions. Habermas is one of the most influential contemporary social theorists and his work has repeatedly been used in public relations scholarship. While some have maintained that his work has been most influential in the development of public relations theory, this stream of research has never been reviewed empirically. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, the authors present a bibliometric literature review of 263 public relations research articles published between 1980 and 2016 that cite and use Habermas’ work. A network analysis of these publications based on the technique of bibliographic coupling was used to identify common forms of application, research themes, as well as patterns of impact. Findings Results show that the use of Habermas has grown significantly, specifically in the recent decade. At the same time, researchers have a narrow focus specifically on earlier developments in the theory. Finally, we discover three main topical research clusters that have been influenced by the theory: public relations and the public sphere, dialogic stakeholder relationships, as well as public relations and communication ethics. Originality/value The findings map out an important stream of scholarship in the field by showing where public relations scholars have been and where the research community has not ventured yet. Based on the results of our analysis, the authors propose directions for research to advance future theory development in public relations using Habermas’ work.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Communication

Reference93 articles.

1. Selfish memes: an update of Richard Dawkins’ bibliometric analysis of key papers in sociobiology;Publications,2017

2. Empirical approaches to deliberative democracy;Acta Politica,2005

3. Benson, R.D. (2008), “Public relations in the public sphere: Habermas, Bourdieu, and the question of power”, paper presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association (ICA), Montreal.

4. Bentele, G. and Wehmeier, S. (2009), “Commentary: linking sociology with public relations – some critical reflections in reflexive times”, in Ihlen, Ø., van Ruler, B. and Fredriksson, M. (Eds), Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 341-361.

5. Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3