Critical realism and attribution theory in qualitative research

Author:

Al-Sharif RamiORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to develop an integrative model that explains how incorporating the two epistemological positions of critical realism and attribution theory can help qualitative organisational researchers better understand the reality of social actors through different lenses. In addition, the paper aims to demonstrate the application of the model through a study of organisational justice perceptions of elite Muslim professionals undergoing performance appraisal in the UK banking sector.Design/methodology/approachThe approach adopted used semi-structured in-depth interviews with Muslim professionals in elite positions in UK Western and Islamic banks. Access to participants was secured through a process of purposive and snowball sampling, a tool often used to recruit hard-to-reach populations. The data were analysed through the integrative model developed in this paper.FindingsThe integration of critical realism and attribution theory provided different dimensionalities of social reality. Attribution theory enabled a systematic identification of social phenomena and their causal mechanisms, defined the characteristics of those mechanisms and highlighted who/what is responsible for and affected by them. Critical realism distinguished between causal mechanisms and the generative forces that help those mechanisms to be actualised and have effect.Originality/valueThe contribution of this paper is twofold. First, to the best of my knowledge, it is the first paper to build a novel integrative model of these two epistemologies. Second, it presents a detailed application of the model in a contemporary study of the perceptions of justice of Muslims in the UK banking sector.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference102 articles.

1. Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation;Journal of Abnormal Psychology,1978

2. Adams, J.S. (1965), “Inequity in social exchange”, in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 2, pp. 267-299.

3. Al-Sharif, R. (2019), “The impact of stereotype threat on talent management: a multi-level study on (dis)trust/(in)justice perspectives of muslims in the UK banking sector”, Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Performance management systems in a shared service centre: an exploration of organisational injustice;Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance;2023-11-13

2. Conceptualizing Entrepreneurship as Emancipation;Justifying Entrepreneurship;2023

3. Work from Home and Employee Well-Being: Insights from Tax Consultant Office Employees During COVID-19;Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectuals’ Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2022);2023

4. The Power of Social Attribution: Perspectives on the Healing Efficacy of Ayahuasca;Frontiers in Psychology;2021-10-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3