Author:
Painter Richard W.,Hardy Stephen
Abstract
Under the European Union’s 1977 Acquired Rights Directive, workers transferred to another employer can expect the majority of their original terms and conditions of employment to be protected and changes made without consultation can constitute constructive unfair dismissal. Confusion over the application of the directive greatly affected the introduction of compulsory competitive tendering to the provision of local authority services in the UK. Many of the issues remain unresolved and will cause problems as compulsory competitive tendering is replaced by the duty on authorities to “achieve best value”. This article seeks to clarify the position for employers by reviewing the most recent case law from both British and European courts.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference7 articles.
1. Adnett, N.J. and Hardy, S.T. (1998), “The Impact of TUPE on CCT: evidence from employers”, Local Government Studies, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 36‐50.
2. Adnett, N.J., Hardy, S.T. and Painter, R.W. (1995), “Business transfers and contracting out: compulsory competitive tendering in tatters?”, Employee Relations, Vol. 17 No. 8, pp. 21‐8
3. Bowers, J. and Clarke, A. (1981), “Unfair dismissal and managerial prerogative: a study of ‘other substantial reason”’, Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 34‐44.
4. Colling, T. (1998), “Views of TUPE and CCT”, Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 152‐4.
5. Escott, K. and Whitfield, D. (1995), The Gender Impact of CCT in Local Government, EOC Report, Research Discussion Series No. 12, Centre for Public Services.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Work futures;Management Research News;2000-09