Abstract
Purpose This article aims to provide prospective authors guidelines that will hopefully enable them to submit more competitive manuscripts to journals publishing careers research.Design/methodology/approach Based on their experience as an author, reviewer and editorial team member, the authors identify the main criteria that a quantitative study must meet to be considered for publication in international peer-reviewed journals covering career-related topics. They emphasize the importance of contributing to the careers literature and of designing the study in accordance with the research question.Findings Manuscripts are rejected because they are insufficiently innovative, and/or because sample, instruments and design are not appropriate to answer the research question at hand. Cross-sectional designs cannot be used to answer questions of mediation but should not be discarded automatically since they can be used to address other types of questions, including questions about nesting, clustering of individuals into subgroups, and to some extent, even causality.Originality/value The manuscript provides an insight into the decision-making process of reviewers and editorial board members and includes recommendations on the use of cross-sectional data.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference81 articles.
1. MTurk research: review and recommendations;Journal of Management,2021
2. Testing a dynamic model of the impact of psychological capital on work engagement and job performance;Career Development International,2018
3. Keeping an insecure career under control: the longitudinal interplay of career insecurity, self-management, and self-efficacy;Journal of Vocational Behavior,2020
4. On making causal claims: a review and recommendations;The Leadership Quarterly,2010
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献