Abstract
PurposeThe authors introduce a new construct, reputational self-awareness (RSA). RSA represents the congruence between how individuals think they are viewed by others (i.e. metaperceptions) versus how they are actually viewed (i.e. other ratings). The authors sought to demonstrate that RSA is a superior predictor of performance indices.Design/methodology/approachPersonality self-ratings from 381 business students and their ratings by 966 others were collected via online surveys. Other raters rated self-raters' personalities as well as their task performance, organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs).FindingsResults indicate that RSA predicts variance in performance above and beyond self-report ratings, and performance is highest when metaperceptions and other ratings of performance are aligned. These results support the use of a multi-perspective approach to personality assessment as a useful tool for coaching and career development.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors' results support the use of a multi-perspective approach to personality assessment as a useful tool for coaching and career development. A cross-sectional design was used in which personality and performance data were gathered from respondents, and the P 720 is a relatively new personality instrument.Practical implicationsRSA is a valuable tool for employee development, coaching and counseling because, as extant research and the authors' findings demonstrate, awareness of how others view and judge one, one's reputation is essential information to guide work behaviors and career success. Therefore, a key career-development goal for trainers and counselors should be to use a multi-perspective approach to maximize clients' RSA.Social implicationsUse of other ratings as opposed to traditional self-rating of personality provides superior prediction of behavior and is more useful for career development.Originality/valueThis is the first study to demonstrate utility of RSA, i.e. that individuals who more accurately assess their personality are rated as performing better by others. The authors' results offer new insights for personality research and career development and support the use of personality assessment from multiple perspectives, thus enabling the exploration of potentially insightful research questions that cannot be examined by assessing personality from a single perspective.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference70 articles.
1. Are we talking about the same thing? The case for stronger connections between graduate and worker employability research;Career Development International,2023
2. The big five personality dimension and job performance: a meta-analysis;Personnel Psychology,1991
3. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: what do we know and where do we go next?;International Journal of Selection and Assessment,2001
4. The why, what and how of career research: a review and recommendations for future study;Career Development International,2022
5. Development of a measure of workplace deviance;Journal of Applied Psychology,2000
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献