Stating the problem: the grammar of repositories

Author:

O'Connor Steve

Abstract

Purpose – Libraries face a “selling” job on the relationship between print and digital as the mode of delivery for content. Too often it is limply said that “everything is on the web” when we know that it is not or that licensed access to the content is not always available. The Lyon’s Declaration promotes freedom of access to information, yet libraries live and work with this paradox. How will the ambitions of the Lyon Declaration be met? So while it is ironic that everything is said to be on the web while it is not, we have powerful evidence of their dynamic purpose and value. This conference series has dealt with this confronting riddle, evolving and refining, but not quite finding the defining moment. The purpose of this paper is to explore the many interfaces here. By understanding this paradox of print and digital we should see the future of the repositories and libraries more clearly and position them more exactly. Design/methodology/approach – The paper explores the rich divergence of responses to the use and development of repositories and proposes future directions. It is an experiential paper as well as one guided by future planning perspectives. Findings – There is a need for a reconceptualisation of the role of print repositories blending in digital solutions together with the more traditional solutions. There is also a strong need for repositories to collaborate internationally in order to be able to render their own work and collections valid and effective in a much wider context. Originality/value – This paper is a series of observations and lessons. It is an extension of practical and managerial work in developing and managing repositories and their collections both in Australia and in Hong Kong. It is a collection views designed to stimulate and potentially guide library practitioners who are thinking and working in this area.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference8 articles.

1. Genoni, P. and Varga, E. (2009), “Assessing the benefits of a national print repository: an Australian overlap study”, College & Research Libraries , Vol. 70 No. 6, p. 10.

2. Genoni, P. and Wright, J. (2011), “Australia’s national research collection: overlap, uniqueness and distribution”, Australian Academic & Research Libraries , Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 162-178.

3. O’Connor, S. (2005), “Economics of repository libraries”, Library Management , Vol. 26 Nos 1/2, pp. 44-49.

4. O’Connor, S. (2009), “Scenario planning and the academic library of the future”, Journal of Academic Librarianship , January.

5. O’Connor, S. and Jilovsky, C. (2009), “Approaches to the storage of low use and last copy research materials”, Library Collections, Acquisitions and Technical Services , Vol. 32 Nos 3-4, pp. 121-126.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3