Navigating service sector innovation using co-creation partnerships

Author:

Burdon Stephen,Mooney Grant Richard,Al-Kilidar Hiyam

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse a series of engineering services partnerships to better understand requisites needed in building high value co-creation alliances – especially where innovation is the strategic goal. Design/methodology/approach – Using a combination of quantitative surveys, qualitative “deep-dive” assessments and a small number of in-situ mini-case investigations this research sets out to analyse 99 joint-venture innovation partnerships. These ventures represent a variety of asymmetric and symmetric alliances within the engineering services sector. Particular emphasis is given to those where the prerequisites for co-creative innovation are either in place or could be built. Findings – Partnering and progressing innovative ideas are important behaviours for organisations seeking higher levels of commercial success and competitive advantage. Navigating the partnering dynamic can also be harder than expected, potentially hindered by misunderstandings and differing expectations between enterprises. Particularly for symmetric endeavours, success often hinges upon not only having clarity in the degree of innovation sought but also alignment as to the depth and stage of the partnering dynamic itself. However, when such collaboration works customer satisfaction and associated contract retention can increase significantly. Originality/value – Most inter-company innovation projects historically seem to occur where one firm is significantly larger than the other. In contrast, this study highlights issues encountered when innovation co-creation projects are undertaken by a mature (as opposed to maturing) organisation in collaboration with partners where the power balance is similar between the two enterprises. In such cases, customer satisfaction surveys can be useful tools for objectively navigating the innovation co-creation experience.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management

Reference54 articles.

1. Antikainen, M. , Makipaa, M. and Ahonen, M. (2010), “Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation”, European Journal of Innovation Manaagement , Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 100-119.

2. AON Hewitt (2011a), Trends in Gobal Employee Engagement , AON Hewitt Ltd, London.

3. AON Hewitt (2011b), “Employee engagement, technology and analytics”, presentation prepared by Consulting, AON Hewitt Ltd, Sydney, May, p. 5.

4. AON Hewitt (2012), 2012 Trends in Gobal Employee Engagement , AON Hewitt Ltd, London.

5. Blumenitt, T. (2004), “Does small and mature have to mean dull? Defying the ho-hum at SMEs”, Journal of Business Strategy , Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 27-33.

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3