Author:
Burdon Stephen,Mooney Grant Richard,Al-Kilidar Hiyam
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to analyse a series of engineering services partnerships to better understand requisites needed in building high value co-creation alliances – especially where innovation is the strategic goal.
Design/methodology/approach
– Using a combination of quantitative surveys, qualitative “deep-dive” assessments and a small number of in-situ mini-case investigations this research sets out to analyse 99 joint-venture innovation partnerships. These ventures represent a variety of asymmetric and symmetric alliances within the engineering services sector. Particular emphasis is given to those where the prerequisites for co-creative innovation are either in place or could be built.
Findings
– Partnering and progressing innovative ideas are important behaviours for organisations seeking higher levels of commercial success and competitive advantage. Navigating the partnering dynamic can also be harder than expected, potentially hindered by misunderstandings and differing expectations between enterprises. Particularly for symmetric endeavours, success often hinges upon not only having clarity in the degree of innovation sought but also alignment as to the depth and stage of the partnering dynamic itself. However, when such collaboration works customer satisfaction and associated contract retention can increase significantly.
Originality/value
– Most inter-company innovation projects historically seem to occur where one firm is significantly larger than the other. In contrast, this study highlights issues encountered when innovation co-creation projects are undertaken by a mature (as opposed to maturing) organisation in collaboration with partners where the power balance is similar between the two enterprises. In such cases, customer satisfaction surveys can be useful tools for objectively navigating the innovation co-creation experience.
Reference54 articles.
1. Antikainen, M.
,
Makipaa, M.
and
Ahonen, M.
(2010), “Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation”,
European Journal of Innovation Manaagement
, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 100-119.
2. AON Hewitt
(2011a),
Trends in Gobal Employee Engagement
, AON Hewitt Ltd, London.
3. AON Hewitt
(2011b), “Employee engagement, technology and analytics”, presentation prepared by Consulting, AON Hewitt Ltd, Sydney, May, p. 5.
4. AON Hewitt
(2012),
2012 Trends in Gobal Employee Engagement
, AON Hewitt Ltd, London.
5. Blumenitt, T.
(2004), “Does small and mature have to mean dull? Defying the ho-hum at SMEs”,
Journal of Business Strategy
, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 27-33.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献