Trust in and through labelling – a systematic review and critique
Author:
Tonkin Emma,Wilson Annabelle M,Coveney John,Webb Trevor,Meyer Samantha B
Abstract
Purpose
– Distrust of conventional food supply systems impacts consumer food choice. This in turn has implications for consumer nutrition outcomes and acceptance of expert advice regarding food and health. The research exploring consumer trust is found across a broad range of research streams, and is not cohesive in topic or approach. The purpose of this paper is to synthesise the disparate literature exploring the interaction between food labelling and consumer trust to determine what is known, and gaps in knowledge regarding food labelling and consumer trust.
Design/methodology/approach
– A systematic search of trust and food labelling literature was conducted, with study results synthesised and integrated. Studies were then critically analysed for the conceptualisation of the consumer, the label, and their interaction with a framework developed using social theories of trust.
Findings
– In total, 27 studies were identified. It was found that not only is the current literature predominantly atheoretical, but the conceptualisation of labelling has been limited.
Research limitations/implications
– Further empirical research is needed to enable a more comprehensive understanding of the role food labelling plays in influencing consumer trust in food systems.
Originality/value
– This research develops a conceptualisation of the dual roles food labelling may play in influencing consumer trust in food systems. It distinguishes between trust in food labelling itself, and the trust consumers develop in the food supply system through food labelling. The novel theoretical model and synthesis provide a foundation upon which future research may be conducted.
Subject
Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference65 articles.
1. Bacchi, C.
(2009),
Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to be?
Pearson, Frenchs Forest, New South Wales. 2. Bacchi, C.
(2012), “Why study problematizations? Making politics visible”,
Open Journal of Political Science
, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1-8. 3. Barbalet, J.
(2009), “A characterization of trust, and its consequences”,
Theory and Society
, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 367-382. 4. Barber, B.
(1983),
The Logic and Limits of Trust
, Rutgers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, NJ. 5. Barnett, J.
,
Leftwich, J.
,
Muncer, K.
,
Grimshaw, K.
,
Shepherd, R.
,
Raats, M.M.
,
Gowland, M.H.
and
Lucas, J.S.
(2011), “How do peanut and nut-allergic consumers use information on the packaging to avoid allergens?”,
Allergy
, Vol. 66 No. 7, pp. 969-978.
Cited by
62 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|