Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to encourage technologists, those who design and manage technology systems, to collectivize and get closely involved in defining the priorities of their organizations, their countries, and the world, so that responsible outcomes can arise from their labour.
Design/methodology/approach
The author examines this problem from three viewpoints: From a design perspective about what is missing in most design practices to build information systems that undesirable outcomes still happen; from an ethics perspective about how to incorporate values in building and managing information systems; and from a political economy perspective about why ensuring responsible outcomes from technology is not easy. The author describes several limitations faced by technologists in achieving this, ranging from gaps in the design methods in use currently, a piecemeal approach to following ethical principles in the design and management of technologies, influence of the organizational culture and structure and the wider political economy of technology itself.
Findings
The author suggests several measures to address these challenges and conclude with a call to technologists to collectivize and engage politically to influence their organizations and governments to invest in meaningful objectives for a just and equitable world, and design and manage the solutions in ethically consistent ways.
Research limitations/implications
It is argued that a new paradigm of information systems is needed for digital platforms, which is grounded in ethics-based guidelines that should be followed by the designers and managers of these platforms to help ensure responsible outcomes.
Practical implications
Having such a paradigm is especially important in today’s winner-takes-all digital platform era because these platforms are governed by only a few people; therefore, it is imperative to build guardrails to responsibly manage these platforms, and to have technologists who design and manage these platforms to play a role in their governance.
Social implications
Information systems have the potential to alter power relationships in society, and it is suggested that they should be designed to empower the weak.
Originality/value
To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is a unique perspective that draws from his personal experience as a researcher and practitioner designing technologies for social good, and examines the problem from many different viewpoints.
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,Communication
Reference45 articles.
1. Marx, machines, and skill;Technology and Culture,1990
2. White-collar unions and attitudes towards income inequality, redistribution, and state-market relations;European Sociological Review,2018
3. Toward an ethics of persuasive technology;Communications of the ACM,1999
4. Campbell, A.F. (2018), “Workers at Google, Amazon, and Microsoft are demanding input on the impact of the technology they build. Vox”, available at: www.vox.com/technology/2018/10/18/17989482/google-amazon-employee-ethics-contracts
5. Chouldechova, A. and Roth, A. (2018), “The frontiers of fairness in machine learning. CCC (computing community consortium) Workshop report”, available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08810
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Unmasking user vulnerability: investigating the barriers to overcoming dark patterns in e-commerce using TISM and MICMAC analysis;Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society;2024-06-10
2. Bibliography;Technology and (Dis)Empowerment: A Call to Technologists;2022-08-29