Author:
Alam Khorshed,Imran Sophia
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors which influence refugee migrants’ adoption of digital technology and its relevance to their social inclusion in Australia.
Design/methodology/approach
– This research developed a conceptual framework keeping the “use” of digital technology as the centre-piece of the digital divide. The empirical data were derived from a series of focus group discussions with refugee migrants in an Australian regional city, Toowoomba in Queensland.
Findings
– There is a digital divide among refugee migrant groups and it is based on inequalities in physical access to and use of digital technology, the skills necessary to use the different technologies effectively and the ability to pay for the services. The opportunities to use digital technology could support the social inclusion of refugee migrant groups in the broader Australian community.
Research limitations/implications
– Further research is required to examine whether this digital divide is unique in the regional context or common to Australian society and to confirm factors that might contribute significantly to refugee migrants’ social inclusion.
Originality/value
– This paper determined the role digital technology can play in building social capital and hence social inclusion among refugee migrant groups. Many of the factors identified as influencing refugee migrants’ use of digital technology can inform the Australian government and the information and communication technology industry in devising supportive policies and plans to reduce the risk of social exclusion, alienation and marginalisation among refugee migrant groups.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems
Reference100 articles.
1. Aspinall, P.
(2007), “Language ability: a neglected dimension in the profiling of populations and health service users”,
Health Education Journal
, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 90-106.
2. Asthana, S.
,
Halliday, J.
and
Gibson, A.
(2009), “Social exclusion and social justice: a rural perspective on resource allocation”,
Policy and Politics
, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 201-214.
3. Bandura, A.
(1986),
Social Foundations of Thought and Action
, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
4. Bandura, A.
(1997),
Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control
, W.H. Freeman & Company, New York, NY.
5. Bandura, A.
(2001), “Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective”,
Annual Review of Psychology
, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 1-26.
Cited by
220 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献