Author:
Andreaus Michele,Rinaldi Leonardo,Pesci Caterina,Girardi Andrea
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the role of accountability in times of exception. The Italian government's account-giving practices are critically analysed with respect to the distinct modes in which duties of accountability are discharged for the exceptional measures taken during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak in early 2020.Design/methodology/approachThis paper draws on an exploratory case study. The case analysis draws primarily on data obtained through publicly available documents and covers the period between January 1 and August 7, 2020.FindingsThe paper reveals that the Italian government employed various accountability styles (rebuttal, dismissal, reactive, proactive and coactive). Each style influenced both how the government justified its conduct and how it sought to form distinctive relationships with social actors.Originality/valueThe paper uses the notion of “styles of accountability” to empirically illustrate how an unprecedented public governance challenge can reveal broader accountability trends. The paper contributes to accountability research by elucidating how governments tackle ambiguity and uncertainty in their systems of public accountability in extraordinary times.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Public Administration
Reference52 articles.
1. Styles of accountability;Accounting, Organizations and Society,1996
2. Financial resilience of English local government in the aftermath of COVID-19;Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management,2020
3. Australia's COVID-19 public budgeting response: the straitjacket of neoliberalism;Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management,2020
4. Breakdowns of accountability in the face of natural disasters: the case of Hurricane Katrina;Critical Perspectives on Accounting,2014
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献