Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to explore whether and how contemporary rankings reflect the dialogic development of smart cities.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is based on the synthesis of smart city (SC), rankings and dialogic accounting literature. It first analyses ranking documents and related methodologies and measures and then reflects on four SC rankings, taking a critical stand on whether they provide space for the polyphonic development of smart cities.FindingsThis study argues that rankings do not include divergent perspectives and visions of smart cities, trapping cities in a mirage of multiple voices and bringing about a lack of urban stakeholder engagement. In other words, there is a gap between the democratic demands on smart cities and what rankings provide to governments when it comes to dialogue. As such, rankings in their existing traditional and technocratic form do not serve the dynamic and complex nature of the SC agenda. This, in turn, raises the threat that rankings create a particular notion of smartness across urban development with no possibility of questioning it.Originality/valueThe paper responds to recent calls to critically examine the concept of the SC and the role that accounting has played in its development. This study brings new insights regarding the value of dialogic accounting in shaping a contemporary understanding of rankings and their criticalities in the SC agenda.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Public Administration
Reference70 articles.
1. Taking city rankings seriously: engaging with benchmarking practices in global urbanism;International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2021
2. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?;Cities,2017
3. Participatory budgeting as a form of dialogic accounting in Russia: actors' institutional work and reflexivity trap;Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal,2018
4. Smart utopia vs smart reality: learning by experience from 10 smart city cases;Cities,2017
5. Governmentality and performance for the smart city;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2020
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献