Abstract
PurposeSince the late 1970s, research in accounting has been colonized by positive accounting theory (PAT) despite strong claims that it is fundamentally flawed in terms of epistemology and methodology. This paper aims to offer new insights to PAT by critically examining its basic tenets.Design/methodology/approachThe paper subjects the language of the Rochester School to a deconstruction that is a transformational reading. This uncovers rhetorical operations and unveils hidden associations with other texts and ideas.FindingsA new interpretation of the Rochester School discourse is provided. To afford scientific credibility to deregulation within the accounting field, Watts and Zimmerman used supplements and missing links to enhance the authority of PAT. They placed supplements inside their texts to provide a misleading image of PAT. These supplements rest on von Hayek's long‐term shaping blueprint to defeat apostles of the welfare state. Yet, to set PAT apart from normative theories that Watts and Zimmerman claimed were contaminated by value judgments, they made no reference in their text to the tight links between the Rochester School and the libertarian project initiated by von Hayek.Research limitations/implicationsAny reading of PAT cannot present the infinite play of meaning that is possible within a text. Deconstruction involves a commitment to on‐going, eternal questioning.Originality/valueThe paper provides evidence of the relation between PAT and the neoliberal (libertarian) project of von Hayek. PAT is viewed as part of the institutional infrastructure and ideological apparatus that legitimates the hegemony of markets.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference96 articles.
1. Alchian, A.A. and Demsetz, H. (1972), “Production, information costs, and economic organization”, American Economic Review, Vol. 62 No. 5, pp. 777‐95.
2. Arendt, H. (2005), Le système totalitaire, Edition du Seuil, Collection: Points essais, Paris, original edition: 1951.
3. Arrington, C.E. (1997), “Tightening one's belt: some questions about accounting, modernity, and the postmodern”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 8, pp. 3‐13.
4. Arrington, C.E. and Francis, J. (1989), “Letting the chat out of the new bag: deconstruction, privilege and accounting research”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 14 Nos 1‐2, pp. 1‐28.
5. Arrington, C.E. and Schweiker, W. (1992), “The rhetoric and rationality of accounting research”, Accounting, Organizations & Society, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 511‐33.
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献