Author:
Tucker Basil P.,Parker Lee D.
Abstract
PurposeThis aim of this study is to explore the relationship between management control systems (MCSs) and the formulation of strategy in not‐for‐profit (NFP) organisations.Design/methodology/approachThe paper views the relationship between MCS and strategy through the contrasting lenses of new‐institutional and contingency theory, using data collected from semi‐structured interviews of CEOs and senior executives in 32 Australian NFPs.FindingsStrategy is formulated predominantly by intended means, through structured strategic planning processes. Emergent strategy is typically a rare means by which strategy is developed, and is in fact often actively discouraged in the NFPs investigated. Contrary to expectations, control is predominantly exercised through informal means, rather than by formally designed systems.Originality/valueWith strategy and control being central concerns for most NFPs, this sector provides a unique vehicle for exploring the “robustness” of prior MCS strategy empirical findings. Investigating the MCS strategy relationship within a highly complex NFP context is thus an “acid test” of existing understanding of the MCS‐strategy nexus. As one of the few studies to investigate the relationship between control and strategy as it may apply in this context, this study refines and further develops extant management control theory.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference109 articles.
1. Abernethy, M.A. and Brownell, P. (1999), “The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: an exploratory study”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 24 Nos 3/4, pp. 189‐204.
2. Abernethy, M.A. and Chua, W.F. (1996), “A field study of control system ‘redesign’: the impact of institutional processes on strategic choice”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 569‐606.
3. Abernethy, M.A. and Lillis, A.M. (1995), “The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 241‐58.
4. Abernethy, M.A. and Stoelwinder, J.U. (1991), “Budget use, task uncertainty, system goal orientation and subunit performance: a test of the “fit” hypothesis in not‐for‐profit hospitals”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 105‐20.
5. Abraham, A. (2004), “A model of financial performance analysis adapted for nonprofit organizations”, paper presented at the AFAANZ 2004 Conference Proceedings, Alice Springs, 4‐6 July.
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献