Leading change and Plato
-
Published:2021-03-12
Issue:2
Volume:24
Page:146-170
-
ISSN:1093-4537
-
Container-title:International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJOTB
Author:
Georgiadis Vasileios, Sarigiannidis LazarosORCID, Theriou GeorgiosORCID
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims at identifying critical components of leading change through relations of relevance with platonic philosophy. During this process, well-known aspects of change leadership are detected, but interpreted differently. Based on this relevance, a seven-stage tripartite model is proposed, in order to facilitate change implementation in the business world.Design/methodology/approachContemporary trends in leading change are reviewed and enriched with platonic insights. A synthetic analysis is attempted, in which philosopher stochasticity and discernment validates modern synergetic and anthropocentric approaches to the field of change leadership, featuring key behavioral and perceptual characteristics, emerging during change process.FindingsAs the process of change is highly dependent on human behavior, Plato grants an enriched approach of its origins and causal causes. Therefore, key change factors are not only discussed in the light of his worldview, but also upgraded through the distillation of applicable ideas, summarized in the proposed three phase model.Practical implicationsThe proposed tripartite model of leading change can function as a powerful guide of designing and successfully implement organizational change.Originality/valueThe screening of specific insights from platonic works in leading change conveys an alternative, more “poetic”, yet effectively flexible attitude endorsed and incorporated into a potentially applicable model.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Public Administration,Applied Psychology
Reference137 articles.
1. Relations at workplace, cynism and intention to leave: a proposed conceptual framework for organizations;International Journal of Organizational Analysis,2017 2. Agger-Gupta, N. and Harris, B. (2017), “Dialogic change and the practice of inclusive leadership”, in Boitano de Moras, A., Dutra, R.L. and Schockman, H.E. (Eds), Breaking the Zero-Sum Game (Building Leadership Bridges), Emerald Publishing, Bingley, BFD, pp. 305-322. 3. Aher, K. and Luoma-Aho, V. (2017), “Contextualizing change in public sector organizations”, in Van Ruler, B., Smit, I., Ihlen, O. and Romenti, S. (Eds), How Strategic Communication Shapes Value and Innovation in Society, Emerald Publishing, Bingley, BFD, pp. 23-36. 4. Amado, G. and Amato, R. (2018), “Some distinctive characteristics of transitional change”, in Amado, G. and Amato, R. (Eds), The Transitional Approach to Change, Routledge, London, pp. 29-81.
|
|