Modularity matters: a critical review and synthesis of service modularity

Author:

Iman Nofie

Abstract

Purpose – The literature on modularity is extensive, but most research has been concerned with the manufacturing sector and much less with the service sector. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the existing research, to provide a critique of the empirical literature on service modularity and to discuss future research opportunities. Design/methodology/approach – To perform this analysis of service modularity, a list of top-tier journals in the field of business management and organisation was compiled. From there, each and every article was identified, examined, coded and classified into high-level themes. These were then reviewed, analysed and interpreted. Findings – This paper argues that the application of modularity in services will likely be influenced by certain characteristics that distinguish services from products. Second, modularity, from the service perspective, has been closely connected to productisation of services, and the discussion of modularity related to services has been greatly influenced by the earlier discussion on product modularity. This paper concludes that modularity in the service development context is still seeking its theoretical “identity” and requires further theoretical and empirical work on service design modularity conceptualisation, methods and measures. Originality/value – This paper has reviewed several significant fields with which research on service modularity has been concerned. It captures and presents the core notion of service modularity in a critical way that might spur further research in the field.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference95 articles.

1. Alexander, C. (1964), Notes on the Synthesis of Form , Harvard University Press.

2. Araujo, L. and Spring, M. (2011), “Complex performance, process modularity and the spatial configuration of production”, Procuring Complex Performance: Studies in Innovation in Product-Service Management , pp. 78-98.

3. Arnheiter, E.D. and Harren, H. (2006), “Quality management in a modular world”, The TQM Magazine , Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 87-96.

4. Arora, A. and Gambardella, A. (1994), “The changing technology of technical change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour”, Research Policy , Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 523-532.

5. Ashby, W.R. (1952), Design for a Brain , Chapman & Hall.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Does service modularity enhance new service development performance in supply chains: an empirical study;Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing;2023-08-15

2. Internal IT modularity, firm size, and adoption of cloud computing;Electronic Commerce Research;2023-04-14

3. Blueprinting construction logistics services for quality improvement;Construction Management and Economics;2022-10-11

4. Exploring the benefits of service productisation: support for business processes;Business Process Management Journal;2021-09-23

5. Identifying and categorising knowledge reuse activities in electronic repositories;VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems;2021-01-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3