Abstract
Purpose
– The literature on modularity is extensive, but most research has been concerned with the manufacturing sector and much less with the service sector. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the existing research, to provide a critique of the empirical literature on service modularity and to discuss future research opportunities.
Design/methodology/approach
– To perform this analysis of service modularity, a list of top-tier journals in the field of business management and organisation was compiled. From there, each and every article was identified, examined, coded and classified into high-level themes. These were then reviewed, analysed and interpreted.
Findings
– This paper argues that the application of modularity in services will likely be influenced by certain characteristics that distinguish services from products. Second, modularity, from the service perspective, has been closely connected to productisation of services, and the discussion of modularity related to services has been greatly influenced by the earlier discussion on product modularity. This paper concludes that modularity in the service development context is still seeking its theoretical “identity” and requires further theoretical and empirical work on service design modularity conceptualisation, methods and measures.
Originality/value
– This paper has reviewed several significant fields with which research on service modularity has been concerned. It captures and presents the core notion of service modularity in a critical way that might spur further research in the field.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference95 articles.
1. Alexander, C.
(1964),
Notes on the Synthesis of Form
, Harvard University Press.
2. Araujo, L.
and
Spring, M.
(2011), “Complex performance, process modularity and the spatial configuration of production”,
Procuring Complex Performance: Studies in Innovation in Product-Service Management
, pp. 78-98.
3. Arnheiter, E.D.
and
Harren, H.
(2006), “Quality management in a modular world”,
The TQM Magazine
, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 87-96.
4. Arora, A.
and
Gambardella, A.
(1994), “The changing technology of technical change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour”,
Research Policy
, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 523-532.
5. Ashby, W.R.
(1952),
Design for a Brain
, Chapman
&
Hall.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献