Abstract
Purpose
Performance measurement systems (PMSs) have long been used for monitoring and improving administrative performance. In parallel, organizational ambidexterity refers to firms that manage different organizational functions and various demands to generate performance. The purpose of this paper is to propose that three dimensions of PMS increase organizational ambidexterity and consequently they influence organizational performance. In this framework, organizational ambidexterity mediates the relationships between three dimensions of PMS and organizational performance.
Design/methodology/approach
The data were collected through a structured questionnaire sent to Brazilian software companies. Owners, directors, project managers and responsible for company strategy answered the questionnaire. The final sample was 227 Brazilian software firms that answered according to their PMSs and organizational ambidexterity.
Findings
The results provide four main findings. First, the three dimensions of PMS, namely—attention focus, legitimization and strategic decision-making—influenced organizational ambidexterity. Second, organizational ambidexterity had a major effect on organizational performance. Third, organizational ambidexterity mediated the indirect effects of attention focus, legitimization and strategic decision-making on organizational performance. Fourth, exploration and exploitation—two dimensions of organizational ambidexterity—mediated the indirect effect of the abovementioned PMS dimensions on organizational performance.
Research limitations/implications
Although there are different dimensions of organizational ambidexterity, this paper is limited to two of the most used ones: exploitation and exploration. In addition, the results were limited to subjective—in contrast to objective—performance measures.
Practical implications
Software companies can use PMS for attention focus, legitimization of firm’s choices and strategic decision-making to increase their exploration and exploitation capabilities. Moreover, software companies can use strategic decision-making to control existing strategies and establish new strategies for legitimizing ambidextrous choices and thereby support their decision-making process.
Originality/value
The data showed that not only organizational ambidexterity mediates the effects of the three dimensions of PMS use on performance, but also exploration and exploitation.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference97 articles.
1. ABES (2017), “Com cerca 1.600 empresas associadas ou conveniadas, que geram mais de 120 mil empregos diretos e atingem um faturamento anual da ordem de 20 bilhões de dólares”, available at: www.abessoftware.com.br/associados/socios (accessed October 12, 2017).
2. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams;Academy of Management Journal,1996
3. Rational, rationalizing, and reifying uses of accounting data in organizations;Accounting, Organizations and Society,1987
4. A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement;MIT Sloan Management Review,1997
5. Management control systems across different modes of innovation: implications for firm performance;Management Accounting Research,2015
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献