Abstract
Purpose
Numerous policies are established in Mauritius to attract foreign direct investment, but at the same time, severe concerns were raised concerning the erosion of Mauritian tax base, which is witnessed by the decrease in the percentage of tax revenue to gross domestic product in recent years. To avoid these issues, in 2019, the Mauritian legislator has domesticated the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) BEPS 2013 Action 3 on controlled foreign company (CFC) in its income tax legislation. As such, the purpose of this study is to critically assess the implications of CFC rules of Mauritius to reduce tax avoidance in the light of international tax competition.
Design/methodology/approach
To achieve the research objective, this study will adopt a black letter approach by analysing the rules and regulations of various jurisdiction as well as international standards on CFCs and other tax avoidance legal provisions. A comparative analysis will be conducted between Mauritian laws on CFCs and the corresponding legislation of the UK and the USA, which are selected to assess the developed world’s position on strict CFC rules.
Findings
A hasty implementation of CFC rules leads to various complexities like interpretation issues and diminishing the competitiveness of the country to multinationals. In this respect, there is the risk of a trade-off between tax collected and foreign direct investment in the country. Consequently, the research recommends that Mauritius reforms its CFC legislation by extending the scope of tax exemptions for intra-group financing income, for the first year of CFC’s operation with the possibility of offsetting foreign taxes and for the Mauritius Revenue Authority to establish detailed guidelines on the determination of CFC income and its attribution for tax purposes in Mauritius.
Originality/value
Existing literature has to a great extent focused on the role of CFC rules as a tax avoidance measure and on the divergence or convergence between domestic CFC legislation against the OECD recommendations (Dourado, 2015; Xu, 2018; Beebeejaun et al., 2023). However, limited literature is available on the evaluation of the purpose of CFC rules enacted by a developing country being Mauritius in the context of the global competitive market, to which this research aims at filling the gap.
Subject
Law,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Reference20 articles.
1. The effect of the tax reform act of 1986 on the location of assets in financial services firms;Journal of Public Economics,2003
2. Avi-Yonah, R. (2018), “The American Prospect: tax act actually promotes off-shore tax tricks”, available at: https://prospect.org/article/tax-act-actually-promotes-shore-tax-tricks (accessed on 4 June 2023).
3. Beebeejaun, A., Gunputh, R.P. and Rafay, A. (2023), “Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) in international taxation system: the case of Mauritius in the light of OECD/G20 initiatives”, Concepts, Cases, and Regulations in Financial Fraud and Corruption, pp. 259-277, available at: www.igi-global.com/chapter/base-erosion-and-profit-shifting-beps-in-international-taxation-system/320026 (accessed on 04 May 2023).
4. The role of CFC rules in the BEPS initiative and in the EU;British Tax Review,2015
5. The impact of controlled foreign company legislation on real investments abroad, a multi-dimensional regression discontinuity design;Journal of Public Economics,2015