Author:
Cegarra‐Navarro Juan‐Gabriel,Cepeda‐Carrión Gabriel
Abstract
PurposeThe Spanish health care system has undergone important changes, particularly in the development of new homecare services. In practice, however, results have been mixed. Some homecare services have been successful, but implementation failures are common and the intended patients are frequently reluctant to use home care services. A possible explanation for efficiency and effectiveness gaps of services provided by hospital‐in‐the‐home units may relate to the advantages and disadvantages of the knowledge processes that these units highlight as a result of their different structural properties. The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual framework for hospital‐in‐the‐home units developed to guide learning within the context of homecare services.Design/methodology/approachUsing data collected from the hospital‐in‐the‐home unit at a Spanish regional hospital, this work examines how the existence of some practices is linked to knowledge transfer and how this component is linked to patient service.FindingsThis paper reports a knowledge management program that is customised and based on four frameworks – i.e. technical infrastructure; people to facilitate and drive the process; a system that supports and rewards sharing; and the team leader.Research limitations/implicationsConducting this type of single case study (an interview‐based case study approach) is to be understood foremost as a prelude to further quantitative studies including common measures for patients, clinicians, staff, managers and board members.Originality/valueIn an applied sense, the model provides homecare practitioners with identifiable factors that enable the four frameworks and address the relevant issues by changing strategies at both the individual and organisational levels. Without a knowledge management program, practitioners may lose the ability to see the market signals stemming from healthcare members, and they may decide to go solely by their own ways of doing and interpreting things.
Reference21 articles.
1. Balas, E., Boren, A. and Boren, S. (2000), “Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement”, Yearbook of Medical Informatics, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.
2. Brakensiek, J.C. (2002), “Knowledge management for EHS professionals”, Occupational Health & Safety, Vol. 71 No. 1, pp. 72‐4.
3. Brown, R.B. (1993), “Selecting the patient”, Hospital Practice, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 11‐15.
4. Carr‐Hill, R. (1992), “The measurement of patient satisfaction”, Journal of Public Health Medicine, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 236‐49.
5. Cleary, P., Edgman‐Levitan, S. and Roberts, M. (1991), “Patients evaluate their hospital care”, Health Affairs, Vol. 10, pp. 254‐67.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献