How to implement a knowledge management program in hospital‐in‐the‐home units

Author:

Cegarra‐Navarro Juan‐Gabriel,Cepeda‐Carrión Gabriel

Abstract

PurposeThe Spanish health care system has undergone important changes, particularly in the development of new homecare services. In practice, however, results have been mixed. Some homecare services have been successful, but implementation failures are common and the intended patients are frequently reluctant to use home care services. A possible explanation for efficiency and effectiveness gaps of services provided by hospital‐in‐the‐home units may relate to the advantages and disadvantages of the knowledge processes that these units highlight as a result of their different structural properties. The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual framework for hospital‐in‐the‐home units developed to guide learning within the context of homecare services.Design/methodology/approachUsing data collected from the hospital‐in‐the‐home unit at a Spanish regional hospital, this work examines how the existence of some practices is linked to knowledge transfer and how this component is linked to patient service.FindingsThis paper reports a knowledge management program that is customised and based on four frameworks – i.e. technical infrastructure; people to facilitate and drive the process; a system that supports and rewards sharing; and the team leader.Research limitations/implicationsConducting this type of single case study (an interview‐based case study approach) is to be understood foremost as a prelude to further quantitative studies including common measures for patients, clinicians, staff, managers and board members.Originality/valueIn an applied sense, the model provides homecare practitioners with identifiable factors that enable the four frameworks and address the relevant issues by changing strategies at both the individual and organisational levels. Without a knowledge management program, practitioners may lose the ability to see the market signals stemming from healthcare members, and they may decide to go solely by their own ways of doing and interpreting things.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference21 articles.

1. Balas, E., Boren, A. and Boren, S. (2000), “Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement”, Yearbook of Medical Informatics, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.

2. Brakensiek, J.C. (2002), “Knowledge management for EHS professionals”, Occupational Health & Safety, Vol. 71 No. 1, pp. 72‐4.

3. Brown, R.B. (1993), “Selecting the patient”, Hospital Practice, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 11‐15.

4. Carr‐Hill, R. (1992), “The measurement of patient satisfaction”, Journal of Public Health Medicine, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 236‐49.

5. Cleary, P., Edgman‐Levitan, S. and Roberts, M. (1991), “Patients evaluate their hospital care”, Health Affairs, Vol. 10, pp. 254‐67.

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3