Author:
DeBoeuf David,Lee Hongbok,Johnson Don,Masharuev Maksim
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to contribute to financial managers’ capital budgeting decision-making processes by proposing a new paradigm of capital investment appraisal. The expected return, required return structure of the proposed purchasing power return (PPR) methodology eliminates the many flaws associated with the competing internal rate of return (IRR) and modified IRR (MIRR) techniques.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors provide a new framework for examining long-term investment projects through a percentage return prism. Unlike that of IRR and MIRR, mathematical consistency with net present value (NPV) is a design requirement.
Findings
PPR eliminates the many flaws found in the IRR and MIRR methodologies, is mathematically consistent with NPV, and identifies positive-NPV investments forecasted to reduce the company’s purchasing power. These projects are acceptable under NPV, but flagged for additional review and potential rejection. Created to examine projects on a percentage return basis, PPR employs market-based inflation rates to convert all cash flows into constant purchasing power units of measure. From these units, an expected real return is estimated and compared to the project’s inflation-adjusted required return, resulting in an accept/reject decision consistent with that of NPV.
Originality/value
The proposed PPR is a new paradigm of capital investment appraisal that eliminates the many problems found in the IRR and MIRR techniques, is mathematically consistent with the NPV method, and helps financial decision makers examine investment projects on an expected percentage return basis. PPR also flags for further review projects expected to actually reduce the company’s purchasing power.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Finance
Reference56 articles.
1. The rate of interest, Fisher’s rate of return over costs and Keynes’ internal rate of return;American Economic Review,1955
2. A note on the modified rate of return and investment criterion;Engineering Economist,1978
3. How to assess investment proposals;Harvard Business Review,1959
4. MIRR: the means to an end? Reinforcing optimal investment decisions using the NPV rule;Journal of Financial Education,2015
5. Net present value and rate of return: implicit and explicit reinvestment assumptions;Engineering Economist,1988
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献