Managing liminality: professional care during organizational change

Author:

Willis Eileen Mary,Morgan Deidre D.ORCID,Sweet Kate

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the way in which the theoretical construct of liminality contributes to understanding the process of dying of cancer from the perspective of patients, carers and professionals in a state-run organization undergoing privatization.Design/methodology/approachQualitative interviews were held with 13 patients and their carers and two focus groups with eight physiotherapists and occupational therapists. Data were analysed from the perspective of liminality for all three actors: patients, carers and health professionals.FindingsThe theoretical construct of liminality was useful for understanding the lived experience of patients and their carers. However, a major finding of this study reveals that health professionals operated in a dual space as both managers of the ritual process and individuals undergoing a liminal journey as their organization underwent transformation or restructure. Clients and carers had little knowledge of these tensions.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings are limited by the fact that the interviews did not directly ask questions about the restructure of the organization.Social implicationsIt would appear that professionals provide quality care despite their own struggles in moving from one organizational form to anotherOriginality/valueFew studies have explored the liminal rituals of dying at home that outline how professionals, as managers of the process, deal with their own liminal issues.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science

Reference40 articles.

1. Between two worlds: liminality and late-stage cancer-directed therapy;Journal of Death and Dying,2015

2. Chronic illness as biographical distruption;Sociology of Health and Illness,1982

3. Responding to imposed job redesign: the evolving dynamics of work and identity in restructuring professional identity;Human Relations,2020

4. Paradoxes of organizational change in a merger context;Qualitative Research in Organization and Mangement,2019

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3