Evaluation of psychological provision into an acute inpatient unit

Author:

Kerfoot Gemma,Bamford Zandra,Amelia Jones Sarah

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to highlight the challenges in evaluating psychological input into acute wards using more traditional methods; and also to provide an example of how it is possible to evaluate such services capturing outcomes at multiple levels.Design/methodology/approachData were gathered from multiple levels including staff, patients and the wider organisation mainly using self report questionnaires. The paper looks at the impact on satisfaction, service utilisation, development of recovery principles, quality of therapeutic environment and alliance with treatment teams following the introduction of a dedicated psychology team.FindingsThe results show positive trends in patient experiences of the ward environment, alliance with treating teams and staff recovery principles, along with reduced readmission rates and length of stay in hospital. Qualitative data demonstrate the value of the service to both staff and patients.Research limitations/implicationsMuch of the data do not meet the criteria for more sophisticated statistical analysis.Originality/valueThe paper provides an example of evaluation of a contemporary model of service delivery for which there is currently a limited evidence base and looks to stimulate current thinking on the practice of mental health service delivery.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference38 articles.

1. Baguley, C. and Baguley, I. (2002), “Psychological treatment for anxiety and depression in schizophrenia”, in Harris, N., Williams, S. and Bradshaw, T. (Eds), Psychosocial Interventions for People with Schizophrenia: A Practical Guide for Mental Health Workers, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

2. Baguley, I. and Dulson, J. (2004), “Psychosocial interventions”, in Harrison, M., Howard, D. and Mitchell, D. (Eds), Acute Mental Health Nursing: From Acute Concerns to the Capable Practitioner, Sage, London.

3. Baguley, I., Alexander, J., Middleton, H. and Hope, R. (2007), “New ways of working in acute inpatient care: a case for change”, The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 43‐52.

4. Beech, A. and Fordham, A.S. (1997), “Therapeutic climate of sexual offender treatment programmes”, Sex Abuse, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 219‐37.

5. Blais, M.A. (2004), “Development of an inpatient treatment alliance scale”, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 192 No. 7, pp. 487‐93.

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3