Author:
Jinks Mary,McMurran Mary,Huband Nick
Abstract
PurposeThis paper seeks to highlight the findings from a research project on improving treatment engagement for clients with personality difficulties.Design/methodology/approachThe authors provide an overview of the studies conducted to date. These are a systematic review of the literature examining non‐completion of psychosocial treatment by people with personality disorder, a systematic review of assessments to measure treatment engagement, and a Delphi survey of both staff and patients' views on factors that impact on engagement in psychosocial treatment for this client group.FindingsPoor engagement with psychosocial treatment is an issue for clients with personality disorder and rates of non‐completion are high. Discontinuation of treatment is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Although a number of assessments exist for measuring engagement, none can be described as comprehensive and few are adequately validated. Engagement factors identified from the survey were broadly in keeping with previous work, but additional factors specific to this client group were identified. A treatment readiness model for people with personality difficulties is described.Practical implicationsResearch outputs from the project are a set of specifications for good practice in facilitating engagement, and a web‐based training package aimed at helping staff improve their understanding of their clients' engagement issues.Originality/valueThe findings will be useful to service managers as well as clinicians working directly with people with personality difficulties. Improving client engagement will improve clinical outcomes and service cost‐efficiency.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference16 articles.
1. American Psychiatric Association (1994), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐IV), 4th ed., American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.
2. Banerjee, P., Duggan, C., Huband, N. and Watson, N. (2006), “Brief psychoeducation for people with personality disorder: a pilot study”, Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, Vol. 79, pp. 385‐94.
3. Coid, J., Yang, M., Tyrer, P., Roberts, A. and Ullrich, S. (2006), “Prevalence and correlates of personality disorder in Great Britain”, British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 188, pp. 423‐31.
4. Drieschner, K.H. and Boomsma, A. (2008), “The treatment engagement rating scale (TER) for forensic outpatient treatment: description, psychometric properties, and norms”, Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 14, pp. 299‐315.
5. Fazel, S. and Danesh, J. (2002), “Serious mental disorder in 23000 prisoners: a systematic review of 62 surveys”, The Lancet, Vol. 359, pp. 545‐50.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献