Re-thinking de-risking: a systems theoretical approach

Author:

També Bearpark Noémi,Demetis Dionysios

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explain the de-risking phenomenon through Luhmann’s risk/danger model and demonstrate that de-risking should be facilitated and encouraged. Design/methodology/approach The paper applies Luhmann’s system theory and more specifically his risk/danger model to describe the de-risking phenomenon and identify recommendations to address its consequences. Findings The paper finds that re-defining risk and the anti-money laundering (AML)’s community’s understanding of it can support key stakeholders’ understanding of money laundering (ML) risk and the way to better address consequences of AML decisions. Practical implications The paper has implications for the banking and regulatory community in relation to the interpretation of de-risking. As systems aim to minimise their exposure to risk, they should not be prevented from de-risking. Originality/value This paper aims to move away from a narrative description of AML phenomena and presents a theoretical foundation for the analysis of ML risk. The current response to de-risking which demonises it and aims to prevent it is deconstructed through this theoretical lens.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Public Administration

Reference55 articles.

1. ACAMS (2014), “Money services Businesses- Victims of the risk-based approach?”, available online: www.acamstoday.org/money-services-businesses-victims-of-the-risk-based-approach/ (accessed 21 March 2021).

2. Systemic risk assessment: a case study;Journal of the Operational Research Society,2007

3. Artingstall, D., Dove, N., Howell, J. and Levi, M. (2016), Drivers and impacts of derisking: a study of representative views and data in the UK, by John Howell and Co. Ltd. for the Financial Conduct Authority. [Project Report], Surrey: John Howell and Co. Ltd, available at: www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/drivers-impacts-of-derisking.pdf (accessed 8 May 2017).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3